Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Unknown vs Smt. Taresh Gupta And Others"
2022 Latest Caselaw 345 UK

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 345 UK
Judgement Date : 22 February, 2022

Uttarakhand High Court
Unknown vs Smt. Taresh Gupta And Others" on 22 February, 2022
                      Office Notes,
                   reports, orders or
SL.                 proceedings or
         Date                                      COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No                   directions and
                   Registrar's order
                    with Signatures
      22.02.2022                        SA No.4 of 2022
                                        Hon'ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

This Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 06.10.2021, passed by the learned District Judge, Dehradun in Civil Appeal No.170 of 2018, "Mukesh Kumar Gupta vs. Smt. Taresh Gupta and Others", whereby the counter claim, preferred by the appellants/defendants, which was allowed by the learned trial court, has been dismissed.

Heard Mr. Neeraj Garg, the learned counsel for the appellants.

The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that admittedly, the shop-in-question was purchased by the original defendant Mr. Swaraj Gupta (deceased). The learned counsel for the appellants further submitted that the case of the plaintiff is that the said shop was purchased from the income of the joint family business.

He further submitted that the plaintiff had sought relief to declare him owner of the said shop and, alternate, he also sought relief to declare him a tenant of the said shop.

The learned counsel for the appellants argued that these reliefs, sought by the plaintiff, were destructive and contradictory reliefs, therefore, the plaintiff cannot seek the said contradictory reliefs.

The Second Appeal is admitted on the following substantial question of law:-

Whether once contention of plaintiff that the property was purchased by joint Hindu Family from its funds and subsequent alleged family settlement dated 28.02.1993 was negatived concurrently and defendant no.1 being the owner of property vide sale deed dated 11.07.1983, learned lower appellate court was justified in dismissing the counter claim of defendant no.1/appellant.

Issue notice to the respondents. Steps to be taken within a week. Post this case on 11.04.2022.

(Alok Kumar Verma, J.) 22.02.2022

Neha

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter