Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2643 UK
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2022
Office Notes, reports,
SL. orders or proceedings or
Date COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No directions and Registrar's
order with Signatures
25.08.2022
C482 No. 1494 of 2022
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate, for the applicant.
Mr. Atul Kumar Sah, Deputy Advocate General, along with Mrs. Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State.
The challenge by the present applicant in the present C-482 Application is to the Charge Sheet No. 116 of 2022, as it has been issued under Sections 224, 225, 120-B, 216, 34 of the IPC, which has ultimately resulted into a registration of a Criminal Case No. 1212 of 2022, before the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldwani, district Nainital.
Consequent to the registration of the aforesaid criminal case, a summoning order dated 26.03.2022, has been issued against the applicant, which is under challenge in the present C-482 Application.
Though, at this stage, this Court is avoiding to record any observations with regard to the set of allegation levelled against the present applicant, for being involved in commission of the offence under Section 216, owing to the fact that the nature of offence, which has been complained of, since it entails a punishment for a period of lesser than seven years, the case of the applicant would fall to be, for consideration under the guidelines laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the judgment of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another, as rendered by the Hon'ble Apex Court in SLP (Crl.) Case No. 5191 of 2021, as decided on 07.10.2021, wherein the Hon'ble Apex Court has laid down certain wider parameters that if the nature of offence complained of falls to be within 'A' category of offences, which is punishable of lesser than seven years of imprisonment, in exception to the other category of offences, which has been dealt with by the Hon'ble Apex Court, the protection is available to the applicant under category 'A' of the Hon'ble Apex Court judgment and particularly in the light of the parameters laid down under clause (e) of the said judgment dated 07.10.2021.
Hence, while disposing of this present C-482 Application, because this Court, in the exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482, cannot venture into merits to appreciate evidence or substitute its finding about the set of allegations, it will be apt, that the applicant surrenders before the Court below and seeks her remedy under category 'A' offences, the procedure of which has been laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in its clause (e), and if the applicant does so within a period of two weeks from today, the same would be considered by the learned trial Court in accordance with law within a period of three weeks thereafter.
Subject to the aforesaid, since the protection has already been granted by the Hon'ble Apex Court, in the guidelines laid down with regard to category 'A' offences in the judgment dated 07.10.2021, the applicant is relegated to resort to the aforesaid remedy under the judgment of Satender Kumar Antil (Supra), by surrendering before the Court below.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 25.08.2022 Mahinder/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!