Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2399 UK
Judgement Date : 1 August, 2022
Office Notes, reports,
orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions and COURT'S OR JUDGES'S ORDERS
No
Registrar's order with
Signatures
CLR No.17 of 2018
With
CLR No.31 of 2018
With
CLMA No.4120 of 2018
With
CLR No.32 of 2018
With
CLMA No.4117 of 2018
With
CLR No.33 of 2018
With
CLMA No.4118 of 2018
With
CLR No.34 of 2018
Hon'ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Dr. Kartikey Hari Gupta, Advocate with Mr. Rafat Munir, Advocate for the revisionists.
Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for respondent no.1 in CLR No.17 of 2018 and except that Mr. Tarun Lakhera, Advocate is appearing for respondent no.1 in other connected revisions.
Mr. M.S. Bisht, Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
The delay condonation applications have been filed by the revisionist. There is 2 days' delay in filing the revisions. The delay is condoned. The respective delay condonation applications would stand allowed.
The identical civil revisions, had already been decided by this Court in a bunch of civil revisions with the leading Civil Revision No.18 of 2018 Powergrid Corporation of India vs. Sunil Thapa and another as decided on 20.07.2022.
In view of the aforesaid judgment, which is not disputed by the counsels, since the present bunch of revisions engages consideration of a common question of fact and law which has already decided on 20.07.2022, these revisions too would stand dismissed in terms of the judgment of 20.07.2022.
(Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.) 01.08.2022 Arti
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!