Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1099 UK
Judgement Date : 4 April, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
ON THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022
BEFORE:
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANOJ K. TIWARI
Writ Petition (S/S) No. 19 of 2019
BETWEEN:
Mohan Singh Bisht ... Petitioners
(By Mr. A.M. Saklani, Advocate)
AND:
State of Uttarakhand & others ... Respondents
(Mr. Narayan Dutt, learned Brief Holder for the State of
Uttarakhand and Mr. Mukesh Kaparuwan, learned counsel for
respondent nos. 2 to 4)
JUDGMENT
1. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as 'Beldar' on daily wages in Garhwal Jal Sansthan w.e.f. 01.10.1987 and after State re-organisation, his services were regularized in Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan on 01.11.2003.
2. According to petitioner, juniors to him were promoted to the post of Junior Assistant, while his claim has been ignored only on the ground that petitioner had not produced certificate of having passed High School and Intermediate Examination.
3. Mr. A.M. Saklani, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that petitioner has passed High School and Intermediate Examinations from U.P. Board and he also possesses Certificate in Computer
from NIT. Thus, according to learned counsel, denial of promotion to the petitioner is unjust and uncalled for.
4. Petitioner has approached this Court seeking the following relief:-
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give the Pay Scale of Rs. 5200-20200 and Grade Pay of Rs. 2400 to the petitioner on the basis of recommendation of Screening Committee dated 16.10.2008 from 01.11.2013.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give the Avartak Shulk to the petitioner as has been given to other employee of department.
(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to give the Sanhat Vetan to the petitioner as has been given to other employees of department from 1.11.201.
(iv) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to promote the petitioner on the Class III post as the petitioner is working in the said post from 1987.
(v) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to count the service of the petitioner rendered in the work charge establishment for the purpose of pentionary benefit.
5. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court thinks that ends of justice would be met, if petitioner is permitted to make representation to the Competent Authority in Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan, who may take decision in the matter.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to make representation to the Competent Authority in Uttarakhand Jal Sansthan. He shall enclose therewith copy of all educational certificates. If such a representation is made by petitioner within three weeks, the Competent Authority shall look into the matter and take appropriate decision, as per law, within four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order along with representation.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) Aswal
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!