Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3918 UK
Judgement Date : 27 September, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH
CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
WRIT PETITION (S/B) No. 415 OF 2021
27TH SEPTEMBER, 2021
Between:
Praveen ...Petitioner
And
State of Uttarakhand and another. ...Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner:Mr. Sandeep Kothari,
learned counsel.
Counsel for the respondents: Mr. B.S. Parihar,
learned Standing
Counsel for the State of
Uttarakhand.
The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT : (per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
The petitioner has raised a very limited
prayer before this Court, namely, that his
representation dated 17.09.2021, addressed to the
Chief Engineer and the HOD, P.W.D., Dehradun, should
1
be considered by the Secretary, P.W.D. as
expeditiously as possible.
2. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, the learned counsel
for the petitioner, submits that by order dated
17.09.2021, the petitioner has been promoted to the
post of Assistant Engineer (Civil) in the Pay Scale of
Rs. 56100-209200, Pay Matrix Level-10. However,
the petitioner is being posted to a remote area. The
petitioner has already undergone angioplasty.
Therefore, he is a cardiac patient. In case the
petitioner is compelled to work in a remote area, it
may certainly jeopardize his life. For, at the present
place of posting, namely, Temporary Division, Public
Works Department, Thatyud, District-Tehri Garhwal,
the health care infrastructure is extremely poor.
Therefore, the petitioner has filed a representation
dated 17.09.2021 before the Chief Engineer and the
HOD of the Public Works Department. However, so
far, the said representation has not elicited any
reaction.
3. According to the learned counsel for the
petitioner, the said representation, in fact, has to be
routed through the Head of the Department to the
Secretary, Public Works Department. Therefore, he
2
prays that the said representation should be
considered sympathetically, and the transfer order
dated 17.09.2021 should be modified by posting the
petitioner to a place, where there would be sufficient
and necessary medical facilities considering his cardiac
ailment.
4. On the other hand, Mr. B.S. Parihar, the
learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand,
submits that the representation of the petitioner would
be considered within a reasonable time as specified by
this Court.
5. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of
by directing the respondent No. 1 to consider the said
representation of the petitioner within a period of two
weeks from today by giving an opportunity of hearing
and to pass a reasoned order. In case the petitioner is
aggrieved by the reasoned order, so passed, he shall
be free to challenge the same. Meanwhile, the
operation of the order dated 17.09.2021 is stayed till
the decision on the representation of the petitioner.
6. Let a certified copy of this order be issued
to the parties, on payment of the prescribed charges,
today itself.
3
7. In sequel thereto, pending application, if
any, also stands disposed of.
8. No order as to costs.
_____________________________
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
___________________
ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt: 27th September, 2021 Rathour
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!