Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4431 UK
Judgement Date : 8 November, 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NARAYAN SINGH DHANIK
Special Appeal No. 342 of 2021
8TH NOVEMBER, 2021
Mr. Desh Raj Singh, the learned counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Tarun Lakhera, the learned Brief Holder for the State of
Uttarakhand.
JUDGMENT:(per Hon'ble The Chief Justice Sri Raghvendra Singh Chauhan)
Having argued the case at some length, the
learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission to
withdraw this appeal.
2. What is indeed surprising about this appeal is
the fact that the appellant has challenged the order
dated 24.08.2021, passed by the learned Single Judge of
this Court in Writ Petition (M/S) No. 901 of 2021,
whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ
petition after imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000/-. For, the
petitioner had approached the Writ Court while
intentionally and deliberately hiding the fact that for the
same set of relief, he had filed a Writ Petition (PIL) No.
87 of 2019, before the learned Division Bench of this
Court. The said PIL was dismissed by the Division Bench
of this Court by its order dated 04.07.2019. Yet
notwithstanding the dismissal of the PIL, on 09.04.2021,
the petitioner had filed a Writ Petition before the learned
Single Judge. Considering the fact that the petitioner had
approached the Court with unclean hands, the learned
Single Judge has not only dismissed the Writ Petition but
has also imposed a cost of Rs. 10,000/- on the
petitioner.
3. Notwithstanding the dismissal of the Writ
Petition and the imposition of a cost of Rs. 10,000/- , the
petitioner has filed the present appeal before this Court.
4. It is, indeed, a shocking state of affairs that
the petitioner, who has approached the Writ Court with
unclean hands and has been imposed a cost of Rs.
10,000/-, still has the courage to file an appeal before
this Court. Even if the learned counsel for the appellant
seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present
appeal, he shall be permitted to withdraw this appeal
only after the appellant has deposited a cost of Rs.
25,000/-. The said cost shall be deposited in favour of
Uttarakhand High Court Advocates Welfare Fund.
2
5. The District Magistrate of the District Haridwar
is directed to ensure that the said cost is duly deposited
with the Uttarakhand High Court Advocates Welfare Fund
within a period of four weeks. The Registry is directed to
inform this Court whether the said amount has, indeed,
been deposited in favour of Uttarakhand High Court
Advocates Welfare Fund or not? In case the said amount
is not deposited within the stipulated period, the
Registry is directed to list this case immediately
thereafter before this Court for further orders.
_____________________________
RAGHVENDRA SINGH CHAUHAN, C.J.
___________
N.S. Dhanik, J.
Dt: 08th November, 2021 Shiksha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!