Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Bhajana Biswas vs The State Of Tripura (Represented By The
2026 Latest Caselaw 246 Tri

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 246 Tri
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Tripura High Court

Smt. Bhajana Biswas vs The State Of Tripura (Represented By The on 4 February, 2026

                               Page 1 of 4



                  HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                            AGARTALA
                           IA 01 of 2026
                     In WP(C)No.42 of 2026
Smt. Bhajana Biswas
Daughter of Late Amrit Lal Biswas,
Moharchara, Kamalnagar,
Kalyanpur, Khowai, Tripura-799 203
                                                      ---Applicant(s)
                                Versus
1. The State of Tripura (represented by the
   Secretary, Department Information & Cultural
   Affairs, Govt. Of Tripura), New Secretary Complex,
   Kunjaban, Agartala
2. The Director, Information, Cultural Affairs,
   Govt. of Tripura, Gangail Road, Agartala, West Tripura
3. The Senior Information Officer,
   Sub-Division ICA Office,
   Teliamura, Khowai Tripura
                                                   ----Respondent(s)

For Applicant(s) : Mr. Dhruba Jyoti Saha, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Mangal Debbarma, Addl. G.A.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

Order 04/02/2026 Learned Counsel Mr. D. J. Saha is present for the applicant-

petitioner.

Learned Addl. G.A Mr. M. Debbarma is present on behalf of

the respondents.

This present applicant-petitioner has challenged the transfer

order dated 06.12.2025 issued by the respondents and by filing

this IA prayed for suspension of the said transfer order till disposal

of the main petition.

Heard both the sides.

It is the case of the applicant-petitioner that she is posted in

the office of SDICA office Teliamura since 2023 and by an office

order dated 24.08.2023 [Annexure-1] her duty was allocated.

Thereafter again on 04.12.2025 [Annexure-2] the allocation of

duty in respect of the applicant-petitioner and others were

changed by the concerned Senior Information Officer and by the

order it was intimated to her that she will only perform the duties

related to the organization of all kinds of cultural activities related

works, field activities as and when assigned by the Officer-in-

Charge with further direction to hand over all the files related to

cultural activities in her custody. After that on 08.12.2025 she

submitted one representation to the local Officer requesting to

handover the files. But that was not taken into consideration for

smooth functioning of the office. Thereafter the respondents-

authority on 06.12.2025 [Annexure-7] issued one show-cause

notice to give explanation in respect of some vouchers for an

amount of Rs.62,651/-. According to Learned Counsel the

application-petitioner in pursuance of the said show-cause notice

submitted her reply on 15.12.2025. But surprisingly on the same

date the respondents-authority by an office order dated

06.12.2024 [Annexure-4] has transferred her from SDICA office

Teliamura to SDICA office Belonia which caused severe hardships

to the present applicant-petitioner. According to Learned Counsel

the petitioner is on the verge of retirement and her mother is

more than 90 years and she is in bad ridden condition and if at

this stage she is to shift from Teliamura to Belonia in that case

that will cause undue hardships to her for which the applicant-

petitioner has approached this case for setting aside the said

transfer order and also to stay operation of the said transfer order

till disposal of the writ petition.

It was further submitted by Learned Counsel for the

petitioner that she has been suffering from severe illness and she

was admitted in Teliamura Sub-Divisional Hospital with effect from

10.01.2025 to 16.01.2025 with some complications and still she is

undergoing treatment. So Learned Counsel urged for taking

lenient view in this regard. In support of his contention Learned

Counsel relied upon one order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of

India in Somesh Tiwari vs. Union of India and Others

reported in 2009 AIR(SC)1399 wherein in para Nos.19 and 20

Hon'ble the Apex Court observed as under:

"19. Indisputably an order of transfer is an administrative order. There cannot be any doubt whatsoever that transfer, which is ordinarily an incident of service should not be interfered with, save in cases where inter alia mala fide on the part of the authority is proved. Mala fide is of two kinds - one malice in fact and the second malice in law.

20. The order in question would attract the principle of malice in law as it was not based on any factor germane for passing an order of transfer and based on an irrelevant ground i.e. on the allegations made against the appellant in the anonymous complaint. It is one thing to say that the employer is entitled to pass an order of transfer in administrative exigencies but it is another thing to say that the order of transfer is passed by way of or in lieu of punishment. When an order of transfer is passed in lieu of punishment, the same is liable to be set aside being wholly illegal."

Relying upon the same it was submitted from the order of

transfer issued by the respondents-authority it appears that she

has been transferred out of malice, to save others which needs to

be interfered with.

On the other hand, Learned Addl. G.A. Mr. M. Debbarma at

this stage sought for seeking appropriate instructions from the

department. This submission is not at all acceptable because this

case was posted on 22.01.2026. After that it was posted on

27.01.2026. But in spite of allowing opportunity nothing could be

submitted by the state-respondents. However, I am satisfied with

the submission of the Learned Counsel for the applicant-petitioner.

It appears that by one memo dated 06.12.2025 [Annexure-7] she

was asked to show-cause to give some explanation and

surprisingly on the same date by another order she was

transferred from SDICA Teliamura to SDICA Belonia which shows

arbitrariness on the part of the respondents-authority and this sort

of action on behalf of the respondents cannot be permitted in the

eye of law.

In view of the above, the order of transfer issued by the

respondents-authority which shall remain suspended/stayed till

disposal of the writ petition.

With this observation this IA stands disposed of.

A copy of this order be supplied to Learned Counsel

appearing for the applicant-petitioner.

Also a copy of this order be communicated to Learned Addl.

G.A appearing for the State-respondents for information and

compliance.



                                                                   JUDGE




MOUMITA                       Digitally signed by MOUMITA
                              DATTA

DATTA                         Date: 2026.02.05 10:31:50 +05'30'


Moumita
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter