Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1166 Tri
Judgement Date : 22 September, 2025
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
RSA No.34 of 2025
Sri Jadunandan Biswas
......Appellant(s)
Versus
Sri Jogesh Jala Das & others
......Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Ratan Datta, Advocate.
Ms. Saswati Nag, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
_O_R_D_E_R_ 22.09.2025
Heard Mr. Ratan Datta, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant.
Perused the record.
The appeal is admitted on the following substantial question
of law:
"Whether the judgment and decree of learned First Appellate Court affirming the judgment and decree of learned Trial Court, was perverse for observing that the title of the plaintiff-appellant in the suit property was under dispute and therefore suit for permanent injunction was not maintainable."
Call for the record from the learned Courts below. Issue notice upon the respondents by registered post with
A/D.
Process to be submitted by the appellant within seven days.
Registry is directed to prepare the PaperBook after receipt
of the record from the learned Courts below and list the matter for
hearing in its usual course.
JUDGE
SUJAY Digitally signed by SUJAY GHOSH
GHOSH 15:58:17 +05'30' Date: 2025.09.23
Dinashree
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!