Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 696 Tri
Judgement Date : 27 March, 2025
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
IA No. 01 of 2024
in Review Pet. No. 32 of 2024
Smt. Priyanka Das
......Applicant(s).
Vs.
The State of Tripura & 2 Ors.
......Respondent(s).
For Applicant (s) : Mr. P Roy Barman, Sr. Adv.
Mr. S Bhattacharjee, Adv.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K De, Addl. GA.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. DATTA PURKAYASTHA
_O_R_D_E_R_ 27.03.2025
Heard Mr. P Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel assisted by Mr. S Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. K De, learned Addl. GA appearing for the respondents.
There has been a delay of 176 days in preferring the petition being Review Petition No. 32 of 2024. It is stated that after receipt of copy of the judgment, the said fact was intimated to the state respondents but the state respondents became silent on the application of the petitioner. Thereafter, the petitioner contacted with Mr. S Bhattacharjee, learned counsel and on perusal of the necessary records learned counsel advised to prefer review petition and ultimately, the review petition was filed with such delay.
Mr. De, learned Addl. GA has not opposed the prayer.
Considered the rival contentions.
This court is satisfied with the explanation of delay as offered by the petitioner.
Accordingly, the delay of 176 days is hereby condoned.
IA is accordingly disposed of.
JUDGE SATABDI DUTTA Digitally signed by SATABDI DUTTA Date: 2025.03.29 14:08:58 -07'00'
Satabdi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!