Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 283 Tri
Judgement Date : 10 January, 2025
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
CRP No.94 of 2024
Sri Sibayan Ch. Das & another
.........Petitioner(s);
Versus
The In-Charge HR-ER, Tripura Asset ONGC & another
.........Respondent(s).
CRP No.95 of 2024 Sri Shyam Lal Das & another .........Petitioner(s);
Versus The In-Charge HR-ER, Tripura Asset ONGC & another .........Respondent(s).
For Petitioner(s) : Mrs. S. Deb (Gupta), Advocate, Ms. Rumpa Dey, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Soumen Saha, Advocate. HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH
Order 10/01/2025
In the Counter Affidavit, the respondents have taken a stand that
the matters relate to temporary occupation under Section 35 under Part VI of
the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in course of which certain trees were felled.
Therefore, the principle of Section 34 under Part V sought to be invoked by the
petitioners is misconceived. The learned Court has rightly granted interest from
the date of the award passed by learned LA Court.
Mrs. S. Deb (Gupta), learned counsel for the petitioners, on the
other hand submits that the occupation may be temporary but in the process,
trees have been felled and compensation has been computed on the damage to
the trees where the principles of Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
would apply. Therefore, interest is to be computed on the enhanced
compensation from the date of the original award or the cutting of the trees and
not from the date of the judgment or award passed by learned LA Judge.
Learned counsel for both the parties seek time to come prepared on
this legal issue.
List both the matters on 24.01.2025.
(APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ
Pijush/
DIPESH DEB Date: 2025.01.10 16:20:40
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!