Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Divisional Manager vs ) Shefali Khatun
2025 Latest Caselaw 1469 Tri

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1469 Tri
Judgement Date : 4 December, 2025

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Tripura High Court

The Divisional Manager vs ) Shefali Khatun on 4 December, 2025

Author: T. Amarnath Goud
Bench: T. Amarnath Goud
                                   Page 1 of 4




                          HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                AGARTALA
                           MAC. APP. NO.54 OF 2025

The Divisional Manager, Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company
Limited, 2nd Floor, Shreeji Tower, Christianbasti, Wall ford, Guwahati-
781005, Kamrup, Assam (Insurer of the vehicle No. TR-01-Y-1510 Bolero
Pick Up)
                                                      ......Appellant(s)

                                  Versus
1) Shefali Khatun, W/O Late Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya.
2) Sarif Hussen Bhuiya, S/O Late Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya
3) Jahid Hachan Bhuiya, S/O Late Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya
4) Md. Tofajjal Bhuiya, S/O Late Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya
Being minor Respondent Nos.2 to 4 are represented by their natural
guardian mother i.e. Respondent No.-1

All are residents of Village- Indira Nagar, P.S.- Melaghar, District-
Sepahijala.

                                                 .......Claimant Respondents

5) Maphij Miah, S/O Nayab Ali Resident of Village- Sonapur, Mouja-
Shobhapur, P.S.- Sonamura, District- Sepahijala, Tripura(Owner of the
vehicle No. TR-01-Y-1510 Bolero Pick Up)

                                             ..........Owner Respondent


For the Appellant (s) :      Mr. S. Chakraborty, Advocate.
                             Mr. S. Das, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s) :      Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate.
                             Mr. R. Debbarma, Advocate.


             HON'BLE JUSTICE DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD
                           ORDER





04.12.2025

[1]            Heard Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant as well as Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

[2] This present appeal has been filed under Section 173 of the M.V. Act 1988 read with Section 168 of the Act, against the judgment and award dated 30.11.2024 passed in T.S.(MAC) 11 of 2020 by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura.

[3] The appellant has prayed for the following reliefs:-

i) Admit this Appeal;
ii) Call for records relevant to the subject matter of the case from the Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura pertaining to the Case No. T.S. (MAC) 11 of 2020;
iii) After hearing the parties be pleased enough to set aside/quash and modify the impugned judgment and award dated 30.11.2024, passed by Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 11 of 2020, and may be kind enough to pass an appropriate order in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court by passing the various judgments in this regard, for the fair ends of justice.
iv) Pending disposal of the present appeal, stay the operation of the impugned judgment and Award dated 30.11.2024 in case No. T.S. (MAC) 11 of 2020 , passed by the Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal , Sepahijala District, Sonamura."

[4] The brief facts of the case is that on 27.05.2018 at about 6.00 am Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya(deceased) husband of the Claimant respondent No.1 and father of the Claimant respondent Nos.2 to 4 was boarded in the vehicle No.TR01Y-1510 (Bolero Pick up) at Indiranagar, Melaghar along with his vegetable to sell the same in Bisramganj whole sale market. There are other vegetable seller also boarded the said vehicle along with their vegetable to sell Bishramganj market. The vehicle was proceeding to the Bisramganj with a high speed. At about 6.30 am when the said vehicle was negotiating a turning near Melaghar panch morti a little distance from Melaghar Petrol pump station the vehicle turned upside down beside the road causing serious injuries to Alamgir Hossain Bhuiya and others.

[5] The learned Tribunal after hearing the parties and on perusal of the material evidence on record has observed as under:

"ORDER It is ordered that, a total amount of Rs.22,15,000/-(Twenty two lakh fifteen thousand) is awarded in favour of the petitioner as compensation. The OP No.2, the Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Company Limited is hereby directed to pay the compensation as awarded. The OP No.2 is also directed to pay the interest @ 8% per annum on total awarded sum from the date of filing of this petition i.e. on 18.09.2020 till the date of realization.
Distribution of Compensation All the claimants are entitled to get compensation. equally. Protection Awarded Compensation Fifty percent (50%) of the amount of compensation of claimant No.1 is to be deposited for five years and the rest amount is to be released in her bank account.
As Claimant No.2 to 4 are minor, the whole amount of his compensation is to fixed deposited for 5 years or till their attaining majority, which ever is later. Furnish a copy of the award to both sides.
The case stands disposed of on contest."

[6] Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated 30.11.2024 passed by the Ld. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Sepahijala District, Sonamura, in T.S (MAC) No. 11 of 2020, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant- Insurance Company.

[7] Mr. S. Chakraborty, learned counsel submits before this Court that the learned tribunal below failed to understand the registration No. TR-01-Y-1510 of the vehicle already expired much before the accident and also points out that at the time of accident the driver of the vehicle was not holding a valid and effective driving license. He further submits that the learned tribunal below assessed the monthly income of the deceased to be Rs. 12,000/- per month following the High Court Notification dated 4th August, 2023 where the accident occurred much prior to this recent notification and thus, he prayed to reduce the same.

[8]            Heard and perused the evidence on record.

[9]            In view of the overall analysis made by the learned tribunal

below and after going through the material evidence in its entirety, this

Court is of the view that the assessment of compensation as awarded by the learned tribunal below is just and proper and needs no interference thus, the findings as arrived by the learned tribunal below stands affirmed. The awarded amount shall be deposited by the insurance company within a period of one month from today, if not already deposited. However, it is made clear that on such deposit, the claimant respondents are entitled to withdraw the same unconditionally as per procedure. Consequently, the present appeal stands dismissed.

[10] Registry is directed to return the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited by the appellant-Insurance company as per procedure.

[11] As a sequel, miscellaneous application(s) pending if any, shall stand closed.

                                                            DR. T. AMARNATH GOUD,    J




 Paritosh

SABYAS Digitally signed
       by SABYASACHI

ACHI GHOSH
       Date:

GHOSH 2025.12.06
       15:56:27 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter