Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1747 Tri
Judgement Date : 5 November, 2024
Page 1 of 3
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
FA NO.05 OF 2024
Smt. Dipali Das,
W/o Lt. Tapan Kumar Das,
Resident of Vill, Bairagi Tilla,
Barjala, P.O. Barjala, P.S.- West Tripura,
Dist-West Tripura.
-----Appellant(s)
Versus
The World at Large
-----Respondent(s)
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. S. Datta, Advocate.
For the Respondent(s) : None.
Date of hearing and delivery of
Judgment & Order : 05/11/2024.
Whether fit for reporting : No.
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT
J U D G M E N T & O R D E R(ORAL)
(T. AMARNATH GOUD, J)
This is an appeal under Section 47 of the Guardians and
Wards Act, 1890, read with Section 96 of the Civil Procedure
Code, 1908, against the order dated 28.02.2024 passed by the
learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala in Civil Misc. (GC)
19 of 2023.
2. The brief facts of the case is that the appellant filed
an application under Section 10 of the Guardians and Wards Act,
1890, read with Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship
Act before the learned District Judge, West Tripura, Agartala, for
the appointment of a legal guardian of the minors, namely Miss
Tania Das, aged about 16 years, and Miss Sonia Das, aged about
10 years, and for the sale/partition of the properties of the minors
to mitigate the educational expenses and maintenance of her
minor daughters. A general notice was published in the daily local
newspaper "Tripura Darpan" dated 23.11.2023 to inform the
general public and any interested persons about the filing of the
aforesaid application by the appellant herein. Since no one
appeared, the case was fixed for evidence. The appellant adduced
her evidence, and after hearing the parties, the learned court
below appointed the appellant as the legal guardian of her two
minor daughters and allowed the partition of the property
mentioned in the schedule but did not permit the sale of the said
property for the welfare of the minors. Hence, the appellant
prefers this appeal.
3. Mr. S. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant, submits that the appellant is a housewife and has no
source of income, and is facing severe hardship in meeting the
educational expenses and maintenance of her minor daughters.
Therefore, he prays before this court to allow the appellant to
partition/sell the property mentioned in the schedule of the
application.
4. Heard and perused the record.
5. In terms of the arguments given on the record, this
present appeal stands allowed and the sale of the impugned
property is permitted. The sale proceeds is to be divided into
3(three) equal parts. 2(two) parts of the said sale proceeds shall
be deposited as fixed deposits in a nationalized bank,
independently, in favor of the appellant's two minor daughters.
The said amount would be there till both the children attains their
age of 20(twenty) years. The appellant-mother is entitled to use
the remaining third portion for herself and also for the care and
dedication of her minor daughters.
6. With the above observations, this present appeal
stands allowed and thus disposed of. As a result, any stay
granted, if applicable, is vacated. Any pending application(s), if
any, also stand closed.
B. PALIT, J T. AMARNATH GOUD, J
suhanjit
RAJKUMAR Digitally signed by
RAJKUMAR SUHANJIT
SUHANJIT SINGHA
Date: 2024.11.08 12:37:43
SINGHA +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!