Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Tripura State Electricity ... vs Smti. Kamalapati Kaloi & Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 355 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 355 Tri
Judgement Date : 1 March, 2024

Tripura High Court

The Tripura State Electricity ... vs Smti. Kamalapati Kaloi & Others on 1 March, 2024

                                       Page 1 of 3




                         HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                               AGARTALA
                   IA No.02/2023 in MFA(FA) No.02 of 2023
                           MFA(FA) No.02 of 2023
The Tripura State Electricity Corporation Limited & others
                                                  .........Applicant/Appellant(s);
                                     Versus
Smti. Kamalapati Kaloi & others
                                                             .........Respondent(s)

For Applicant/Appellant(s) : Mr. N. Majumdar, Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. T. Halam, Advocate.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH

Order 01/03/2024

IA No.02/2023 in MFA(FA) No.02 of 2023

Heard Mr. N. Majumdar, learned counsel for the

applicants/appellants and Mr. T. Halam, learned counsel for the respondents-

claimants on the prayer for condonation of delay of 284 days in preferring the

instant memo of appeal.

The appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated

07.12.2022 passed by learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Court No.2,

Agartala, West Tripura in Money Suit No.22 of 2018 whereby the learned

Court has allowed compensation of Rs.23,07,000/- on account of death of their

son due to electrocution along with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of

institution of the suit till its realization failing which the awarded sum would

carry 12% interest per annum from the date of filing of the suit till its

realization.

Mr. N. Majumdar, learned counsel for the applicants-Corporation,

submits that the period for filing appeal is 90 days. However, the application

for certified copy was made on 16.11.2023. It was ready for delivery on

13.12.2023. Though the application for certified copy was made just after the

pronouncement of judgment, but the requisite folio and court fees could not be

made within time. As such, the application for certified copy was rejected. This

was communicated to the Corporation by the learned counsel representing

them. The department processed the file and obtained legal opinion from the

concerned officer who advised for preferring an appeal after obtaining proper

sanction. Thereafter, the appeal was to be submitted on or before 06.03.2023.

But the case file was misplaced during movement of file and could not be found

even after rigorous search. Ultimately for want of necessary documents and

papers and for maintaining official procedure, the appeal could not be filed

within the stipulated period. In the process, the file had moved from one table

to another and undergone scrutiny before preferring the appeal. The appellants

has a good case on merits as a huge amount of compensation has been awarded

in favour of the claimants without proper appreciation of the materials placed

on record. Therefore, delay may be condoned otherwise appellants may suffer

irreparably.

Mr. T. Halam, learned counsel for the respondents-claimants, has

opposed the prayer. Despite time granted earlier, no written objection has been

filed by the respondents. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the

delay is inordinate and has not been properly explained. As such, the instant

application may be rejected.

I have considered the submission of learned counsel for the

applicants/appellants and learned counsel for the respondents-claimants. On

consideration of the explanations urged, it appears that the delay has been

occasioned in processing the file in the Corporation and obtaining legal opinion

and also for the reason that the certified copy of the order could not be obtained

in time as requisite folio, etc. were not filed within time. The Corporation and

its officials deserve to be more diligent in such matters.

However, this Court, on consideration of the facts and

circumstances explained and upon hearing learned counsel for the parties, is

inclined to condone the delay subject to payment of cost of Rs.7,500/-. Cost

should be paid to the claimants within a period of 3(three) weeks from today.

IA stands disposed of.

The appeal is admitted for hearing.

Call for the lower Court records from the concerned Court.

Office to prepare Paper Book after receipt of the LCRs.

List the matter in usual course.

(APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ

MUNNA SAHA Digitally signed by MUNNA SAHA Date: 2024.03.02 13:27:16 +05'30'

Pijush/

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter