Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Gopesh Sarkar And Anr vs The Manager
2024 Latest Caselaw 941 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 941 Tri
Judgement Date : 21 June, 2024

Tripura High Court

Sri Gopesh Sarkar And Anr vs The Manager on 21 June, 2024

Author: T. Amarnath Goud

Bench: T. Amarnath Goud

                               HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                                     AGARTALA
                                      Mac.app 104 of 2023
Sri Gopesh Sarkar and Anr.
                                                                                   ---Appellant(s)
                                               Versus

The Manager, Bargang Tea Company Private Limited
                                                                                ---Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s)                      :        Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate.
For Respondent(s)                     :        Mr. Samar Das, Advocate.
Date of hearing and date of
judgment and order                    :        21.06.2024
Whether fit for reporting             :        No


           HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

                                 Judgment and Order (Oral)

Heard Mr. S. Lodh, learned counsel for the appellant also heard Mr. Samar

Das, learned counsel for the respondents.

[2] This is an application under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988,

against the judgment & Award dated 21.06.2023, passed by the learned Member, Motor

Accident Claims Tribunal, Tribunal No.2, West Tripura, Agartala in TS (MAC) 37 of

2021 for enhancement of the compensation.

[3] The appellant has prayed for the following reliefs:

           (i)    Admit the appeal;
          (ii)    Call for the case records:

(iii) After hearing the parties set aside the impugned Judgment & Award dated 21.06.2023 passed by the Ld. Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Court No.2, West Triprua, Agartala in TS(MAC) 37 of 2021 and pass an adequate award, in terms of the claim petition.

[4] Briefly stated the case of the claimant-respondents is that on 15-12-2019 at

about 17.10 hrs, the deceased Brinda Rani Sarkar was proceeding towards her parental

house on foot and at 17-10 hrs when she reached at Saharo Bari near Kalibazar on

Agartala-Bamutia Road at that time one Motor Cycle bearing registration No. TR-01-F-

7277 was coming towards opposite direction being driven very rashly and negligently at a

very high speed and lost control due to excessive speed and subsequently dashed Brinda

Rani Sarkar. As a result, she sustained fatal injuries on various parts of her body and

thereafter she was taken to AGMC & GBP Hospital for treatment where the attending

doctor declared her as dead. It was further asserted that the accident occurred because of

rash and negligent riding by the rider of the aforesaid Motor Cycle and that at the time of

accident the deceased was 39 years old and a private tutor and was earning Rs.20,000/-

per month. Thus, the claimant-petitioners being the legal representatives of the deceased

claimed Rs.38,45,000/- as compensation.

[5] The learned Tribunal after hearing the parties and on perusal of the material

evidence on record has observed as under:

"The instant application under Section-166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 filed by the claimant-petitioners is hereby partly allowed and a sum of Rs.9,50,060.00 (Rupees Nine Lakh fifty thousand and sixty) only is awarded in favour of claimant

- petitioners as compensation for the death of late Brinda Rani Sarkar, in a Road Traffic Accident, as aforesaid, and this amount of compensation shall be paid by OP within a period of one month. The aforesaid amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum to be paid from the date of filing of claim-petition, i.e., from 22.02.2021 till the date of payment."

[6] Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the judgment and award dated

21.06.2023 passed in connection with T.S.(MAC) 37 of 2021 by the learned Member,

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.2, West Tripura District, Agartala, the present appeal

has been preferred by the appellant.

[7] When the case is called Mr. Samar Das, learned counsel appeared for the

respondent-Insurance Company and contended that the present appeal does not require

any interference from this Court. The notional income was fixed at Rs.5000/- per month

by the learned tribunal below since the deceased was unemployed and there was no proof

of evidence. Considering Rs.5000/- as notional income was itself unjust and prayed to

dismiss the appeal. Since it is not open for the respondent to contend that considering

notional income of Rs.5000/- is also excessive since they have not preferred any appeal,

this court is not entertaining such argument. In so far as fixing the amount Rs.5000/- as

notional income is concerned, placing reliance on Shiv Kumar and Others vs Gainda Lal

and Others reported in (2022) 14 SCC 342 which is placed on record by Mr. S. Lodh,

learned counsel for the appellant wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has fixed the

notional income as Rs.7500/- to an unemployed housewife who was a private tutor in the

case cited (supra). Since the present case also falls under the same ambit where the

petitioner has studied upto HSLC and also taking private tuitions at residence, the

notional income is fixed at Rs.7500/- as per the judgment cited (supra). Thus the

computation would be as follows:

                    (i)          Monthly income Rs.7500/-
                   (ii)          Rs.7500/- + Rs. 3000( 40% future prospect) = Rs.10500/-
                  (iii)          One third deduction Rs.10500/- - Rs.3500/- = Rs.7000/-
                  (iv)           So, the loss of dependency is Rs.7000 x 12 x 15 = Rs.12,60,600/- (Rupees twelve lakhs
                                 sixty thousand and six hundred) only.
                    (v)          Loss of Estate = Rs.15000/-
                   (vi)          Funeral expenses = Rs.15,000/-
                  (vii)          Spousal consortium and Parental Consortium = Rs.80,000/- (Rs.40000 each to husband
                                 and son)

        [8]                      Thus the claimants are entitled to get Rs.12,60,000/- + (loss of dependency)

+ Rs.15000/- (for funeral expenses) + Rs.15000/- (for loss of estate) + Rs.80,000 (for loss

of spousal consortium and parental consortium) totaling Rs.13,70,000/- (rupees thirteen

lakhs and seventy thousand) only. The aforesaid amount shall carry interest @ 6% per

annum to be paid for the date of filing of claim petition i.e. from 22.02.2021 till the date

of payment. The awarded amount shall be deposited by the respondent herein within a

period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this order, if not deposited.

However, it is made clear that on such deposit, the appellant is liberty to withdraw the

same unconditionally as per procedure.

[9] In the light of the above, the present appeal stands allowed to the extent as

indicate above. As a sequel miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

Draw the decree accordingly and thereafter, send down the LCRs forthwith.




                                                                                                        JUDGE
        Dipak

DIPAK      Digitally signed by
           DIPAK DAS

DAS        Date: 2024.06.29
           13:05:53 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter