Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance ... vs Smti. Babita Marak And 4 Others
2024 Latest Caselaw 933 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 933 Tri
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2024

Tripura High Court

Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance ... vs Smti. Babita Marak And 4 Others on 20 June, 2024

Author: T. Amarnath Goud

Bench: T. Amarnath Goud

                                      Page 1 of 3




                       HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                          A_G_A_R_T_A_L_A
                            MAC. App. No.54 of 2023

1.    Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd.
                                                                       ..... Appellant

                                  -V E R S U S-
1.    Smti. Babita Marak and 4 Others.

                                                                    .....Respondents.

B_E_F_O_R_E HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD

For Appellant(s) : Mr. R. Saha, Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. S. D. Choudhury, Advocate.

Mr. S. Datta, Advocate.

Whether fit for reporting     :       YES/NO

                Judgment and order dated 20th June, 2024
                      JUDGMENT & ORDER [ORAL]

Heard Mr. R. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the appellant also heard Mr. S. D. Choudhury, learned counsel and Mr. S. Datta, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.

[2] This is an appeal filed under Section-173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 read with Section-168 of the Act, filed by the appellant, the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 28.06.2022 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No.5 West Tripura, Agartala in connection with case No. T.S.(MAC) 202 OF 2017.

[3] The appellant has prayed for the following reliefs:

(i) Admit the Appeal condoning the delay of 251 days in preferring the present appeal;

(ii) Call for the case records from the Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No. 1, West Tripura, Agartala, in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 202 of 2017, West Tripura, Agartala.

(iii) After hearing the parties be pleased enough to set aside/ quash and modify the impugned judgement and award dated 28.06.2022, passed by the Learned Tribunal below and may be kind enough to pass an appropriate order in terms of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court by passing the various judgments in this regard, for the fair ends of justice.

(iv) Pending disposal of the present appeal, stay the operation of the impugned judgment and Award dated 28.06.2022 in Case No. T.S. (MAC) 202 of 2017, passed by the Learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, No. 5, West Tripura, Agartala"

[4] The claimant respondents in the present appeal had instituted a claim suit under the Motor Vehicles Act, before the Ld. MAC Tribunal, West Tripura, Agartala alleging that on 19.05.2017 Satya Marak met with a road traffic accident due to which he died.

[5] The present appellant had appeared in the said suit and contested the suit. After full-fledged trial of the suit and hearing the arguments advanced by all the parties, the Ld. Tribunal below passed the award dated 28.06.2022 whereby and where under a sum of Rs. 23,16,304/- (Rupees Twenty Three Lakh Sixteen Thousand Three hundred Four only) has been awarded as compensation for death of the deceased in the aforesaid road traffic accident.

[6] The learned Tribunal after hearing the parties and on perusal of the material evidence on record has observed as under:

"The Noticee No.1., The Divisional Manager, Cholamandalam General Insurance Co. Ltd is directed to deposit the awarded compensation of Rs.23,16,304/-. (Rupees Twenty three lakhs sixteen thousand three hundred four) only within 30 days from today with interest thereon at the rate of 8% per annum with effect from date of filing of the claim application i.e., from 24.10.2017 to till realization of the full.

Distribution of Compensation

The claimant No.1 being widow is entitled to get 60% of the compensation and claimant No.2 is entitled to the rest compensation.

Protection Awarded Compensation

As claimant No.2 is minor the full amount of him is to be fixed deposited for the period till he attain 21 years or for five years whichever is later.

Sixty percent (60%) of the amount of compensation of claimant No.1 is to be fixed deposited for five years and the rest amount is to be released in her favour in her bank account.

In case of necessity, the tribunal can be approached for withdrawal of fixed deposited amount. On maturity of the fixed depositis the Banker shall credit the amounts to the sole SB Accounts of claimants without any further order from the tribunal."

[7] Having been aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid impugned judgment and award dated 28.06.2022, passed by the learned tribunal below, the present appeal has been preferred by the appellant.

[8] It is seen from the award that the Court below has given a specific finding with regard to the fastening of liability on the OP Nos.1 and 2 and at the same time, the Court observed that the compensation to be paid and recover as revealed from the findings of the Court below thus: "....In my opinion, the insurance company-the Noticee No.1 can be directed to pay compensation to the claimants at the first instance and recover the same from OP No.1, the owner by applying the principle of pay and recovery even though the registration certificate, driving licence, road permit and fitness certificate are not produced. 20. Specifically, I am of the view that in absence of registration certificate, the insurance company can be directed to pay compensation and recover the same from owner...." The operational portion of the award, the pay recovery portion is missing, though the appellant-insurance company could have approached the Court below under Sections-152 and 151 of CPC seeking correction of the order in view of the omission occurred in the order and the present appeal is filed & at this stage, considering the cases under the Motor Vehicles Act as a beneficial legislation and remanding the matter back to the Court below, this Court considers the same and accordingly modifies the order as per reasons indicated in the order i.e. pay and recovery. Insofar as the interest part 8% which is fixed this Court is following the uniform imposing of interest @7.5% in all the matters and accordingly, the same is reduced as the counsel has pleaded the same. The awarded amount be deposited in the Court within one month from today and on such deposit, the claimants are at liberty to withdraw the same unconditionally, as per procedure.

[9] In the light of the above, the present appeal stands partly allowed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Draw the decree accordingly and thereafter, send down the LCRs forthwith.

                                                         T. Amarnath Goud, J



A.Ghosh

ANJAN      Digitally signed by
           ANJAN GHOSH

GHOSH      Date: 2024.07.01
           15:53:37 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter