Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Central Agricultural University vs Dr. Vinodakumar Somashing Naik
2024 Latest Caselaw 1300 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1300 Tri
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2024

Tripura High Court

Central Agricultural University vs Dr. Vinodakumar Somashing Naik on 30 July, 2024

                                      Page 1 of 3




                         HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                               AGARTALA

                                  WA No.79 of 2024
1. Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Manipur, Pin-795004.
2. Vice Chancellor, Central Agricultural University, Imphal, Manipur, Pin-
795004.

3. The Dean, College of Fisheries, Central Agricultural University, Lenbucherra,
Tripura.

(The appellant Nos. 1 & 2 are represented by appellant No.3)

                                                                       ....... Appellant(s)
                            VERSUS
1. Dr. Vinodakumar Somashing Naik, son of Sri S.N. Naik, permenant resident
of 24A, Hullur LT Muddebihal Taluk, Vijayapur District, Pin-586213,
Karnataka.
Present address: Quarter No.12, Type-III, 2nd Floor, Agriculture College Quarter
Complex, Opposite of Vivekananda Boys' Hostel, Lembucherra, P.S. Lefunga,
Tripura West, Pin-799210.
                                                               ...... Respondent(s)

2. The Union of India, represented by the Secretary, to the Department of Agriculture (DARE), Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001.

...... Proforma-Respondent(s) For Appellant(s) : Mr. B. Majumder, Deputy SGI, Mr. S. Lodh, Advocate.

For Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Bhattacharya, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Samar Das, Advocate.

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. APARESH KUMAR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. D. PURKAYASTHA

_O_R_D_E_R_ 30/07/2024

The writ petition was preferred with the following prayer:

             i.     Admit this petition
             ii.    Issue notice upon the Respondents.

iii. Call for the records relating to the subject matter of this case. iv. After hearing the parties be pleased to set aside/ Quash letter No.CAU/Reg/2641/2020; dated 13.06.2024 (Annexure-7) to the writ petition.

v. Directing the respondents and each of them to transmit the application of the petitioner for the post of Associate Professor to the University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore within 02.06.2024.

[2] The learned writ Court upon hearing the parties directed the

respondents who are appellants and proforma-respondent No.2 herein to issue

'No-objection Certificate' in favour of the petitioner/respondent No.1 herein to

make him eligible for submitting application for appointment to the post of

Associate Professor. It was, however, made clear that the petitioner/respondent

No.1 herein may not be relieved of his present posting as Assistant Professor

under the respondents before completion of 5 years. Therefore, being aggrieved,

the Central Agricultural University, Imphal has preferred this appeal. Vide order

dated 08.07.2024, notice was issued upon the writ petitioner-respondent No.1 and

interim order was passed in favour of the appellant-Central Agricultural

University.

[3] Learned counsel for the appellant had taken a preliminary objection

to the maintainability of the writ petition, at the first instance, before this Court in

view of the notification dated 25.10.2007 issued by the Ministry of Personnel,

Public Grievances and Pensions (Department of Personnel and Training)

whereunder the Central Agricultural University, Imphal has been declared to be

an organization covered under Section 14(3) of the Central Administrative

Tribunals Act, 1985.

[4] Today, Mr. D. Bhattacharya, learned senior counsel for the writ

petitioner on instructions seeks liberty to withdraw the writ petition in order to

move before the appropriate forum i.e. the learned Central Administrative

Tribunal having jurisdiction over the subject matter.

[5] Learned counsel for the appellants does not have any objection to

the prayer.

[6] In view of the request made, the writ petition is dismissed as

withdrawn. The impugned judgment is, accordingly, set aside. The petitioner is at

liberty to move the learned Central Administrative Tribunal having jurisdiction

over the subject matter in accordance with law.

[7] Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending

application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.

(S. D. PURKAYASTHA), J (APARESH KUMAR SINGH), CJ

Munna S MUNNA SAHA Date:

2024.07.31 15:41:43 +05'30'

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter