Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt. Dipali Saha vs Sri Bimal Bikash Saha
2024 Latest Caselaw 1121 Tri

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1121 Tri
Judgement Date : 10 July, 2024

Tripura High Court

Smt. Dipali Saha vs Sri Bimal Bikash Saha on 10 July, 2024

Author: T. Amarnath Goud

Bench: T. Amarnath Goud

                             Page 1 of 4




                    HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                          AGARTALA
                    MAT APP NO.17 OF 2023

 Smt. Dipali Saha
                                             ......Appellant(s)

                           Versus

 Sri Bimal Bikash Saha
                                           .....Respondent(s)

For the Appellant(s) : Mr. A.K. Pal, Advocate.

For the Respondent(s) : Mr. B.C. Laskar, Advocate.

Mr. H. Laskar, Advocate.

Date of hearing and delivery of Judgment & Order : 10.07.2024.

Whether fit for reporting : NO.

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWAJIT PALIT

J U D G M E N T & O R D E R(ORAL)

This present appeal has been filed under Section 28

of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 read with Section 19(1) of the

Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging the impugned Judgment

and Order dated 30.08.2023 and decree dated 04.09.2023

respectively passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, West

Tripura, Agartala in Case No.T.S.(Divorce) 255/2017 whereby

the suit of divorce filed by the respondent-husband herein has

been allowed by the learned Court below.

2. Heard Mr. A.K. Pal, learned counsel appearing for

the appellant-wife, and Mr. H. Laskar, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent-husband.

3. Mr. A.K. Pal, learned counsel appearing for the

appellant-wife submits that the Judgment and Decree passed

by the learned Trial Court is against the will of the wife-

appellant. The learned Trial Court below without considering

the facts and circumstances of the wife-appellant passed the

Judgment and Decree in favour of the husband-respondent

and granted the decree of divorce. Moreover, the permanent

alimony and the maintenance amount as given by the Court

below to the wife-appellant is on the lower side considering

the fact that the husband is the owner of a bookshop in

Agartala and have landed properties. Learned counsel further

submits that no opportunity was given to the appellant-wife

by the learned Court below to examine witness on her behalf.

4. On the other hand, Mr. H. Laskar, learned

counsel appearing for the husband-respondent submits that

the Judgment and Decree as passed by the Court below is just

and proper. Learned counsel further submits that the

husband-respondent is the employee in the bookshop and not

the owner of the bookshop. Learned counsel further submits

that the respondent-husband has gifted landed property to the

wife-appellant and the same has been deposed by the wife-

appellant in her deposition.

5. Heard and perused the evidence on record.

6. No evidence has been provided by the appellant-wife

to establish the income of the husband-respondent. Further,

no evidence has been put forth to verify that the respondent is

the owner of the bookshop or he has many landed properties.

However, on the cross-examination of the wife-appellant

herein, she stated that landed property has been given to her

in the form of gift-deed by the husband-respondent. This

Court also does not find any list of witnesses given by the

appellant-wife to the Court below to support her case.

7. In view of the above circumstance, this Court

is of the opinion that if Rs. 9,00,000/-(Rupees Nine Lakhs) is

given to the appellant-wife towards permanent alimony, the

same would be just and proper. Accordingly, the same is

ordered to pay within 3(three) months from today in equal

monthly instalments. However, on payment of this permanent

alimony, the monthly maintenance paid by the respondent-

husband to the appellant-wife herein as ordered by the Court

below stands void. As seen from the evidence of D.W.-1, it is

evident that the respondent-husband has gifted landed

property to the appellant-wife. The same is restored in

addition to permanent alimony as given above. In case of any

civil dispute, it is open for the parties to avail remedies under

the law before the Competent Court.

8. With the above observation and direction, this

present appeal is disposed of and the impugned Order and

Decree is upheld. As a sequel, stay if any stands vacated.

Pending application(s), if any also stands closed.

                    B. PALIT, J                     T. AMARNATH GOUD, J




  suhanjit


RAJKUMAR Digitally
         RAJKUMAR
                   signed by

SUHANJIT SUHANJIT SINGHA
         Date: 2024.07.12
SINGHA   14:02:44 +05'30'
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter