Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 1033 Tri
Judgement Date : 1 July, 2024
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
Crl.Rev.P. 48 Of 2023
Sri Chandan Dey Petitioner(s)
Versus
Smt. Minakshi Dey & Anr. Respondent(s)
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.G Chakraborty, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Samarjit Bhattacharjee, Advocate.
Mr. D. Paul, Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T. AMARNATH GOUD
ORDER
01.07.2024
This Criminal Revision Petition has been filed under Section 401
read with Section 397 of Cr.P.C seeking the following reliefs:-
"i. Admit this revision petition:
ii.Call for the records;
iii. Issue notice upon the respondent and iv. After hearing of the parties and on perusal of the evidence on record be pleased enough to set aside/quash the impugned judgment and order dated 31.07.2023 passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Unakoti Tripura, Kailashahar in Crl. Appeal 05 (03) of 2022 wherein and whereby the Ld. Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal and arbitrarily upholding the orders of conviction and sentence dated 11.07.2022 passed by Ld. J.M 1st Class, Kailashahar, Unakoti Tripura in case no. CR (NI) 4/2017 wherein the Ld. Trial Court convicted the petitioner under section 138 of N.I Act.".
[2] Heard Mr. RG Chakraborty, learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Paul, learned counsel appearing for the
respondent.
[3] It is seen from record that on 4.10.2023 as per the Court
proceedings the petitioner has not been able to manage 50% of the fine
amount directed by this Court, however the petitioner has been able to
arrange Rs. 30,000/- for the present, which he is ready to pay to the
respondent and handed over the same on 16.10.2023 and there was a
direction for depositing 50% fine amount by order dated 15.12.2023 and
the matter was directed to be listed on 16.02.2024 with a direction that in
the event if the petitioner fails to deposit, the case would be dismissed for
default. In spite of the same, the matter has underwent several
adjournments including referring it to Lok Adalat but the entire exercise has
become futile despite this court's repeated docket proceedings including the
latest proceedings on 29.05.2024 and 31.05.2024. The petitioner has not
shown any diligence before this court regarding the aforesaid docket
proceedings.
[4] In view of the same, this court has no hesitation to say that the
petitioner has defaulted the orders passed by this Court. Hence, for non-
compliance of the orders passed by this Court, the case is dismissed for
default. However, the respondent is at liberty to take steps in accordance
with law. Personal appearance of the party concern is /are hereby dispensed
with.
[5] With the above observation and direction, this present Criminal
Revision Petition stands disposed of. As a sequel, miscellaneous
application(s), pending if any, shall stand closed.
JUDGE
Paritosh
SABYASACH Digitally signed by SABYASACHI GHOSH
I GHOSH Date: 2024.07.03 03:24:55 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!