Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 7 Tri
Judgement Date : 11 January, 2024
Page 1 of 1
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
IA No.1 of 2023
In
FA No.4 of 2023
Chandan Kanti Dhar
....Applicant(s)
Versus
Ratna Poddar
....Respondent(s)
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. D. Debnath, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D. PURKAYASTHA Order
11/01/2024
Heard Mr. S. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. D. Debnath, learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
This is an application filed under Order 41 Rule-3A of CPC read with Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1908 and Section 19(3) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 for condoning the delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal against the judgment dated 14.06.2023 passed by the Ld. Addl. Judge, Family Court, Agartala, in T.S.(Div) 392/2019.
Mr. Bhattacharjee, learned counsel has submitted that the delay caused in preferring the appeal was unintentional and the reasons for the same have been explained in the instant application.
Mr. D. Debnath, learned counsel has not raised any objection to the prayer for condonation of delay.
Considering the above submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the parties and after going through the reasons for causing delay, we deem it fit to allow the instant application.
Accordingly, the delay of 26 days in preferring the connected appeal is hereby condoned and the present application is allowed and disposed of
JUDGE JUDGE Snigdha
SANJAY Digitally signed by SANJAY GHOSH
GHOSH Date: 2024.01.11 16:24:16 +05'30'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!