Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 39 Tri
Judgement Date : 9 January, 2023
Page 1 of 5
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
L.A. APP. No.38/2022
The Deputy Chief Engineer (Construction), N.F. Railway, Badarghat Railway
Complex, P.O.-Siddhi Ashram, P.S.-Amtali, Agartala, Tripura West.
...... Appellant(s)
VERSUS
Smt. Gita Rani Dey and others.
......Respondent(s)
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Asutosh De, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : None.
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)
Order
09/01/2023
Heard Mr. Asutosh De, learned counsel appearing for the
appellant-N.F. Railway.
2. This appeal under section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894
(hereinafter referred to as the Act) is directed against the award dated 31-01-
2022 passed by the learned Land Acquisition Judge, South Tripura, Belonia
in case No. L.A. (Ref.) 117 of 2018 whereby the learned L.A. Judge
assessed the value of the acquired bastu class of land of the claimants at
Rs.12,00,000/- per kani with all other statutory benefits.
3. Appellant has prayed for the following reliefs:
"(a) Admit this appeal;
(b) Call for records of L.A. (Ref.) 117 of 2018 from the Court Ld. Land Acquisition Judge, South Tripura, Belonia (Sri A. Pandey);
(c) Issue notice upon the respondents;
(d) After hearing the parties, be pleased to allow this appeal by setting aside the judgment and award dated 31.01.2022 passed by the Ld. Land Acquisition Judge, South Tripura, Belonia (Sri A. Pandey), in connection with L.A. (Ref.) 117 of 2018;
(e) Any other relief and relives as your Lordship deem fit and proper having regards to the facts and circumstances of the case."
4. The undisputed facts are that 0.20 acres of Bastu class of land
and 0.74 acres of Tilla class of land, i.e. in total 0.94 acres of land under
Mouja-Manubazar of Sabroom Sub-Division belonging to the claimants
were acquired by the Government of Tripura (L.A. Collector) vide
Notification No.F.9(07)-REV/ACQ/XIII/2012 dated 07.01.2013 for the
purpose of construction of "New Rail line" from Agartala to Sabroom and
compensation of Rs.3,30,000/- per kani for Bastu class of land and
Rs.60,000/- per kani for Tilla class of land were awarded along with all
statutory benefits. Being dissatisfied, the claimants filed claim statements
being L.A. (Ref.) 117 of 2018 before the learned Land Acquisition Judge,
South Tripura, Belonia for enhancement of compensation for the acquired
land and the learned L.A. Judge after recording evidence and hearing
arguments was pleased to enhance the compensation by awarding
Rs.12,00,000/- per kani along with all consequential benefits vide award
dated 31.01.2022. Aggrieved thereby, the appellant-N.F. Railway has
preferred this appeal for setting aside the impugned award passed by the
learned L.A. Judge. Hence, this case.
5. Mr. Asutosh De, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-
N.F. Railway, contends that the learned L.A. Judge committed an error in
determining the market value of the acquired land since the same is situated
far away from the road and not a cultivable land and as such, there is no
potential value of the acquired land. He also contends that the claimants
during adducing evidence presented some exemplar deeds which are far
away from the acquired land and also of small quantity for which the same
should not be taken into consideration for determining the quantum of
compensation. He further contends that after construction of the railway line,
the surrounding area of the acquired land became highly developed but
learned L.A. Judge did not deduct the development charge from the
compensation amount awarded and as such, he prays for setting aside the
impugned award passed by the learned L.A. Judge.
6. Having heard the submission of the learned counsel appearing
for the appellant-N.F. Railway, this Court is of the considered view that the
claimants had produced six nos. of exemplar sale deeds out of which on
perusal of one sale deed No.1-465 of the year 2011, it is found that Bastu
class of land was sold @ Rs.20,00,000/- per kani and Tilla class of land was
sold @ Rs.5,01,538/- per kani. It is also found that the plots under the
exemplar sale deeds and the acquired lands are also situated within the same
mouja and the land was acquired for construction of Agartala to Sabroom
railway line and as such, definitely the acquired land has got its high
potentiality. Therefore, this Court is of the considered opinion that the
arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant in the light of
above discussion cannot be accepted.
7. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed. Consequently, the
impugned award dated 31-01-2022 passed by the learned Land Acquisition
Judge, South Tripura, Belonia in case No. L.A. (Ref.) 117 of 2018 is hereby
confirmed. The claimants are at liberty to withdraw the amounts deposited
unconditionally.
8. Stay order, if any, stands vacated.
Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
CHIEF JUSTICE (ACTING)
Pulak
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!