Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 717 Tri
Judgement Date : 29 July, 2022
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
AGARTALA
RFA No. 46 of 2019
Smt. Dipali Debnath
(Acharjee),
---- Appellant(s)
Versus
Smt. Basanti Debnath
And Anr.
---- Respondent(s)
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate Mr. K. Nath, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajib Saha, Advocate Mr. I. Banik, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Order
29/07/2022
Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted
by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the appellant. Also heard
Mr. Rajib Saha, learned counsel and Mr. I. Banik, learned counsel
appearing for the respondents.
A partition suit was instituted by the respondents. The suit
was decreed. Thereafter, the appellant has preferred the instant appeal.
During the proceeding of the appeal, this court has made an attempt for
conciliation, since the disputes relates to the mother and her two
daughters. The process of conciliation has ended successfully and the
parties to the suit out of their own will and volition have amicably settled
their disputes and have placed a compromise petition before us. In the
compromise petition, the parties have mutually agreed upon the terms and
conditions as contained therein.
As such, this compromise petition containing the terms and
conditions, as mutually arrived at between the parties, is accepted by this
court and, according to us, it is in form.
Accordingly, the compromise petition placed before us by
the parties shall form a part of this order, and decree may be drawn
accordingly. The judgment and decree passed by the learned trial court
are set aside and quashed.
The instant appeal stands disposed in the above terms.
JUDGE JUDGE Snigdha
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!