Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Biswajit Das vs Smti. Priyanka Das
2022 Latest Caselaw 135 Tri

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 135 Tri
Judgement Date : 3 February, 2022

Tripura High Court
Sri Biswajit Das vs Smti. Priyanka Das on 3 February, 2022
            IN THE HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                    AGARTALA

                      MFA No.2 of 2018
  Sri Biswajit Das,
  son of Sri Jatindra Das,
  resident of village:Barkhala,
  Bashpukur, P.S. Jatrapur,
  District: Sepahijala, Tripura
                                                          ......... Appellant (s)
                              -Versus-
  Smti. Priyanka Das,
  wife of Sri Biswajit Das,
  daughter of Sri Balai Das,
  resident of village: South Nalchar,
  P.S. Melaghar,
  District: South Tripura
                                                ............ Respondent(s)

For the Petitioner (s) : Mr. R. G. Chakraborty, Adv. For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Koushik Roy, Adv.

Date of hearing & delivery        :        03.02.2022
of Judgment & order
Whether fit for reporting         :        NO


          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. TALAPATRA
       HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
                    JUDGMENT & ORDER [ORAL]

            Heard    Mr.     R.       G.   Chakraborty,    learned    counsel

appearing for the appellant and Mr. Koushik Roy, learned counsel

appearing for the respondent.

[2] This appeal arises from the judgment dated

25.01.2018 delivered in Case No. Title Suit (Divorce) 22 of 2016

by the Addl. District Judge, West Tripura, Sonamura. The

appellant had filed a petition seeking divorce under Section

13(1)(ia) &(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 on the ground of

cruelty and desertion.

[3] By the Judgment dated 25.01.2018, the Addl. District

Judge after giving the reasons which are challenged in this

appeal has observed that the appellant has failed to establish the

fact of desertion. and cruelty for purpose of obtaining a decree of

divorce against the respondent. The appellant has challenged

that decree. During pendency of this appeal, the parties through

the intervention of the well wishers of the respective families

have realized that it would be beneficial for both the parties if

they brought an end to their marital relation by a decree of

divorce and on mutual consent, they have arrived at a

settlement, terms and conditions which been recorded in the

joint petition filed by the parties on 31.01.2020. The terms and

conditions are the foundations of mutual consent to get the

marriage dissolved by a decree.

[4] It is an admitted fact that the parties are living

separately since 08.09.2018. According to the parties, they have

agreed to the following terms and conditions for dissolution of

the marriage on their own volition:

"1. That, both the parties had decided to file the instant joint SOLENAMA mutually according to their free volition, without being influenced by anybody.

2. That, after they are divorced from each other, then none of the parties shall bring any frivolous litigation against

each other, and they will also not file any case or suit, litigation or proceeding against each other, either civil or criminal, in any form or code arising out of the matrimonial tie, subsisted before the marriage.

3. That, the minor girl namely Miss Trisha Das will reside with her mother permanently and the father will also have the right to see the minor girl, with the prior appointment and consultation with the mother, and the meeting place will be determined accordingly.

4. That, the Husband Petitioner hereby undertakes, in consideration, to give the wife, as permanent alimony, for an amount of a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. The wife petitioner has given a true receipt thereof to the husband petitioner.

5. That, both the parties hereby also undertakes that, they will revoke the pending cases, if any, against each other, including their parents or other relations, etc. so that the dispute can be dissolved in its entirety.

6. That, after the marriage is dissolved both the party will be free to take their decision own and they have liberty to lead their life in accordance with their suitable desire and will be at liberty to marry again with the appropriate registration, before the competent authority.

7. That, both the parties hereby further undertakes that, the terms and conditions of the instant Petition is binding upon them, and they will not deviate from the stand, as envisages in this petition.

8. That, both the parties undertakes that, no STRIDHAN is lying in the house of the husband petitioner and wife has also no claim over it, as both the parties has got their respective articles with true receipts.

In acknowledgement whereof we put our signature of this joint SOLENAMA on this the 31st day of January, 2022 A.D. before the Notary Public in District & Session Judge Court Premises, West Tripura, Agartala."

[5] Since the parties are living separately 08.09.2019 it

appears to us that emotional bonding between the parties has

become extremely feeble and hence, reasons are apparent why

they could come to such settlement. Even though the

appropriate course would have been to a petition file under

Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. But as the issue of

divorce is pending in this appeal and the memorandum of

settlement has been produced before us following the spirit of

Order 23, Rule 3 of the CPC, we are of the view that it will not be

inappropriate to revert the parties to a further litigation. Hence,

the petition for divorce be treated as a petition for divorce on

mutual consent. We find no impediment in granting the decree of

divorce as the terms and conditions as agreed by the parties, as

those are lawful. when the parties have agreed to dissolve the

marriage, the marriage can be dissolved. We approve the terms

and conditions No.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8. Subject to strict

compliance of the terms and conditions the marriage that is

subsisting between the appellant and the respondent stands

dissolved forthwith. The parties are at liberty to lead their

individual life without interference from each other. It is clarified

that by this settlement any claim as raised or to be raised in

future by the daughter is not covered. She will have the

independent right to proceed, if permitted by law.

The appeal stands disposed of in terms of the above.

Registry is directed to prepare the decree accordingly.

Send down the LCRs thereafter.

          JUDGE                                            JUDGE




Moumita
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter