Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Gopendra Suklabaiya vs The State Of Tripura
2021 Latest Caselaw 1100 Tri

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1100 Tri
Judgement Date : 15 November, 2021

Tripura High Court
Sri Gopendra Suklabaiya vs The State Of Tripura on 15 November, 2021
                                Page 1 of 5


                      HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA
                               AGARTALA
                           WP(C) 762 OF 2020
Sri Gopendra Suklabaiya,
S/o Lt. Girindra Suklabaidya, resident of Vill. & P.O. South Hurua,
P.S. Dharmanagar, North Tripura.
                                                              ... Petitioner.
                                    Vrs.
1. The State of Tripura, represented by the Secretary,
Department of Higher Education, Government of Tripura,
New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunjaban,
P.S. New Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN-799010.

2. The Director of Higher Education,
Govt. of Tripura, P.N. Complex, Agartala, West Tripura.

3. The Principal, Govt. Degree College,
Dharmanagar, North Tripura.

4. The Secretary, Finance Department, Govt. of Tripura,
New Secretariat Building, New Capital Complex, Kunajaban,
P.S. New Capital Complex, Agartala, West Tripura, PIN-199010.

                                                          ... Respondents.

Present:

For the petitioner (s) : Mr. P. Roy Barman, Sr. Advocate.

Ms. Aradhita Debbarma, Advocate.

For the respondent (s) : Mrs. Sarama Deb, Advocate.

    Date of hearing &      : 07.10.2021 & 15.11.2021
    delivery of judgment &
    Order
             HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ARINDAM LODH

                        Judgment & Order(Oral)

The matter was heard on 07.10.2021 at length and the

judgment was passed orally in open Court. But, after passing the judgment

this court found some errors on factual aspects which were not brought to

the notice of the court and as such, fixed the matter at the column

"Speaking to the Minutes" for re-hearing.

2. Today (15.11.2021) I heard again Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned

Sr. counsel assisted by Ms. A. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner. Also heard Mrs. S. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the State-

respondents.

3. By way of filing the present writ petition, the petitioner has

prayed for regularization and restoration of his service.

4. The facts in brief are that the petitioner was engaged as Daily

Rated Worker (DRW) on 19.04.2003. It is his grievance that since October,

2019 he was not paid of his wages and not allowed to continue his job as

Casual Worker under the respondents.

5. Mr. Roy Barman, learned Sr. counsel has submitted that the

service of the petitioner as Casual Worker should be regularized granting

regular pay scale applicable for a Group 'D' employee. Admittedly, the

petitioner was engaged as a Casual Worker on 19.04.2003 and he did not

come within the purview of the policy declared by the State respondents

vide Memorandum dated 1st September, 2008 and 21st January, 2009,

which provided that the persons who were irregularly engaged as

Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated Worker with financial concurrence and

completed 10 years of service as on 31.03.2008 would be eligible for

regularization. However, the State-respondents i.e. the Finance

Department, Government of Tripura had taken policy dated 03.01.2014

after being noticed that some of such Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated

Workers were engaged after 31.03.2003 and the State-respondents in their

own wisdom had taken a policy to regularize the services of those

Casual/Contingent/Daily Rated Workers who had completed 10 years of

service on their engagement after 31.03.2003 with prior concurrence of the

Finance Department. Admittedly, the petitioner was engaged on

19.04.2003 i.e. after 31.03.2003. The competent authority under which the

petitioner was engaged had made correspondence with the Director of

School Education informing him that the petitioner was engaged on

19.04.2003 as Casual Worker and has been serving the department with the

consent of the Finance Department of the State Government and also had

completed 10 years of service. As per the policy decision of the

Government dated 03.01.2014, the service of the petitioner ought to have

been regularized w.e.f. the next date of completion of 10 years of service

i.e. w.e.f. 20.04.2013.

6. In pursuance of the policy dated 03.01.2014, the Principal,

Government Degree College, Dharmanagar, North Tripura, made a

communication dated 27th January, 2014 to the Director of Higher

Education, Government of Tripura [Annexure 12 to the writ petition]

wherein he was informed about the status of the petitioner. But for certain

reasons the service of the petitioner was not regularized. But, admittedly,

the service of the petitioner was continued by the respondents and his

wages were being paid. All on a sudden, the Principal, Government Degree

College, Dharmanagar, North Tripura vide communication dated 4th

December, 2019 had informed the petitioner that his salary was held up

from October, 2019 in view of the Memorandum dated 31st July,2018,

which was issued by the Under Secretary, Government of Tripura, Finance

Department. It is noticed that the State-respondents to ensure transparent

public employment policy for engagement of staff for such services, all the

memorandums were repealed. The wages of the petitioner was held up and

he was not allowed to continue his service under the Principal, Government

Degree College, Dharmanagar, North Tripura.

7. Mrs. Deb, learned counsel appearing for the State-respondents

has submitted that the present petition is barred by principle of delay and

laches. The petitioner would have approached the court much earlier when

he completed 10 years of service on 19.04.2013.

8. I have noticed that in pursuance of the policy decision dated

03.01.2014, the Principal, Government Degree College, Dharmanagar,

North Tripura had informed the Directorate of Higher Education for

regularization of the service of the petitioner after furnishing all details of

the petitioner, but, the State-respondents were sitting idle. The respondents

had utilized his service for almost 16 (sixteen) years. In my opinion, though

the previous policies were repealed, but, the petitioner had accrued his right

to regularize during the existence of a valid policy which was declared by

the Government on 03.01.2014. As such, the petitioner is entitled for

regularization. The State-respondents are directed to issue necessary

direction for regularizing the service of the petitioner within a period of

three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Simultaneously, the State-respondents shall restore his service as Casual

Worker in which capacity he was working under the Principal, Government

Degree College, Dharmanagar within 3 (three) weeks from the date of

receipt of the copy of this order.

With these observations and directions, the writ petition stands

allowed and disposed.

JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter