Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

N.Danaiah And 46 Others vs Naveen Mittal, I.A.S., Hyd And 3 Others
2025 Latest Caselaw 6307 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 6307 Tel
Judgement Date : 6 November, 2025

Telangana High Court

N.Danaiah And 46 Others vs Naveen Mittal, I.A.S., Hyd And 3 Others on 6 November, 2025

Author: P.Sam Koshy
Bench: P.Sam Koshy
         THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
                              AND
 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

          CONTEMPT CASE Nos.1577 and 1588 of 2017

COMMON ORDER:

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Mr.P.Raghavendra Reddy, learned counsel for the

petitioners and Mr.S.Rahul Reddy, learned Special Government

Pleader attached to the office of learned Advocate General

appearing for respondent-officers and perused the record.

2. These are two Contempt Cases which had come before this

Court against the so-called non compliance of orders passed in

W.P.No.1225 of 2016 and W.P. No. 41797 of 2015 both of which

having got disposed of on 19.04.2017 and 06.03.2017 respectively.

3. Vide the said two orders in the writ petitions, there was a

specific direction to the respondents to regularize services of the

petitioners in accordance with the G.O.Ms.No.212,

dated 22.04.1994 issued by the Government on their fulfilling the

requisite eligibility criteria and also on their completion of five

years continuous service against the sanctioned vacant posts. The

orders of the High Court was subjected to challenge before the

Hon'ble Supreme Court vide SLP(C) No. 13813 of 2018 which got

dismissed on 23.07.2024 with a direction to ensure

the implementation of the aforesaid orders. Meanwhile, however,

for non-compliance, these Contempt Cases were filed.

4. On the previous dates of hearing, the learned counsel

representing the State along with Contemnors, who, are present in

the Court, had assured the Bench of making efforts in ensuring that

the orders are complied with in its letter and spirit at the earliest.

The Court has granted then some time and fixed the matter today.

5. Today, again all the incumbent officers of the post attached

are present in the Court along with their Counsel. The Contemnors

have filed an affidavit dated 06.11.2025 showing the order of

compliance made by the Court. In the order dated 24.10.2025, the

respondents have issued proceedings regularizing the (85) persons

with effect from the dates reflected against their name in the list

i.e. on completion of five years of continuous service by these

(85) persons.

6. Learned counsel for the respondent-Contemnors further has

brought to the notice of the Court that the pay fixation also has

been done in respect of these 85 persons and they have been

granted notional fixation and seniority from actual of regularization

till 06.03.2017 that was the date of WP.No.41797 of 2015 stood

decided. Learned counsel for the respondents further has made it

clear that the petitioners would be entitled for actual monetary

benefit from 06.03.2017 on wards because on which date the

judgment rendered by the High Court in the aforesaid writ petition.

7. During the course of deliberations, the learned State

Government Counsel for the Contemnors on instructions from the

Officers present in the Court has assured that every endeavour shall

be made in ensuring that the actual monetary benefit is also

released to the petitioners maximum within a period of (90) days

from today. In addition, the Officers present in the Court have also

through their Counsel informed that so far as the persons who have

also stood retired/expired during the intervening period, the

respondents shall make an endeavour in ensuring that the monetary

benefits flowing from the order of regularization is actually

released to them within a period of four weeks. So far as the

remaining petitioners are concerned, learned Counsel has assured

the respondents should positively make the payments within (90)

days period assured.

8. With the aforesaid observations and directions, these

Contempt Cases stand disposed of. The respondents stand

discharged from the contempt proceedings. Their presence also

stands dispensed with. No costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,

in both the cases shall stand closed.

__________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J

_______________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J

06.11.2025 nvl/aks

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter