Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 393 Tel
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2025
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA
AND
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NOs.173 OF 2013 AND 67 OF 2018
Mr.J.Prabhakar, learned counsel for the appellant in FCA.No.173 of 2013 and respondent in FCA.No.67
of 2018.
Mr.P.Vidya Sagar Reddy, learned counsel for the appellant in FCA.No.67 of 2018 and respondent in
FCA.No.173 of 2013.
COMMON JUDGMENT:
(Per Hon'ble Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya)
We have heard learned counsel appearing for the appellants in
both the Appeals.
2. The first Appeal i.e., FCA.No.173 of 2013 arises out of a
dismissal of the appellant's petition for restitution of conjugal rights
and the second Appeal i.e., FCA.No.67 of 2018 arises out of a
dismissal of the appellant's petition for guardianship of the minor
child.
3. Counsel submits that the parties have been living separately for
the last 17 years and that the child is now almost a major. The
appellant in FCA.No.173 of 2023 does not wish to proceed with the
Appeal. The appellant in FCA.No.67 of 2018 expresses similar
intention.
MB,J & BRMR,J
and 67 of 2018
4 Since nothing remains to be adjudicated in the Appeals,
FCA.No.173 of 2023 and FCA.No.67 of 2018 are disposed of in term of
the above. All connected applications are disposed of.
Interim orders, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no
order as to costs.
__________________________________ MOUSHUMI BHATTACHARYA, J
______________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 15.07.2025 DUA
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!