Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt.Ratnamala vs R.Janarthan Reddy
2025 Latest Caselaw 349 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 349 Tel
Judgement Date : 11 July, 2025

Telangana High Court

Smt.Ratnamala vs R.Janarthan Reddy on 11 July, 2025

       THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

              CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1376 of 2025

ORDER:

This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioner/judgment-

debtor/defendant invoking the provisions under Section 115 of the

C.P.C. seeking to set aside the order dated 20.03.2025 passed in

E.P.No.7 of 2017 in O.S.No.71 of 2012 on the file of the Senior Civil

Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Zaheerabad, whereunder the

E.P. filed by the respondent/decree-holder/plaintiff under Order XXI

Rules 54, 30, 64 and 82 of the C.P.C. is allowed.

2. Heard Mr. P. Shanker Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner

and Mr. Tirukovela Amarnath, learned counsel for the respondent.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

respondent filed suit in O.S.No.71 of 2012 on the file of the Senior

Civil Judge-cum-Assistant Sessions Judge, Zaheerabad, for recovery

of amount basing on the promissory note dated 11.02.2011 and the

said suit was decreed on 10.12.2015. Thereafter, the

respondent/decree-holder filed E.P.No.7 of 2017 and the same was

allowed on 20.03.2025. He further submitted that pursuant to the

interim order granted by this Court, dated 26.06.2025, the

petitioner/judgment-debtor deposited 50% of the decretal amount in

E.P.No.7 of 2017. The petitioner, being a house wife, due to her

financial condition, she could not pay the decretal amount. The

petitioner is ready and willing to pay the balance decretal amount and

requested the Court to grant eight (8) months to pay the said amount

in equal instalmments.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent submits that the

petitioner is protracting the litigation one way or the other. The

decree was passed by the trial Court on 10.12.2015. If the petitioner

pays the remaining decretal amount within four (4) months, he is not

having any objection.

5. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the

respective parties, without expressing any view on the merits of the

case, the petitioner is directed to pay the balance decretal amount

along with accrued interest and costs, pursuant to the decree passed

by the trial Court dated 10.12.2015 in six (6) equal monthly

installments payable on or before 5th of every month commencing

from August 2025, in default of any of the installments, the

respondent/decree-holder is entitled to file an appropriate application

before the Execution Court, pursuant to the order passed in E.P.No.7

of 2017 dated 20.03.2025.

6. With the above directions, the civil revision petition is disposed

of. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.

______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 11.07.2025 Note:

Issue C.C. in three (3) days.

(b/o) mar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter