Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kaipilyawar Satish Bhaskar Rao vs The Government Of India
2025 Latest Caselaw 1845 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1845 Tel
Judgement Date : 6 February, 2025

Telangana High Court

Kaipilyawar Satish Bhaskar Rao vs The Government Of India on 6 February, 2025

     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J.SREENIVAS RAO

               WRIT PETITION No2315 OF 2025

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief:

" ... to issue a Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in refusing to renew the passport to the petitioner vide notice File No.HY2076905525124 Legal Section dated 30.09.2024 and 03.10.2024 pursuant to the Passport application submitted by the petitioner vide file No.HY20769 05525124 Application Reference No.241010135473, dated 04.09.2024 on the ground that a criminal case vide C.C.No.275 of 2023 Filing No.326 of 2023 in Cr.No.74 of 2023 on the file of the Police P.S. Sadashivnagar, Kamareddy District on the file of the Honble Additional Junior Civil Judge- cum-Special Judicial First Class Magistrate Mobile at Kamareddy is pending against him as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law, violation of principles of natural justice and against rules and set aside the notice File No.HY207690 5525124 Legal Section dated 30.09.2024 and 03.10.2024 and consequently direct the 2nd respondent to issue/renew the passport to the petitioner by considering the passport application submitted by him vide file No.HY2076905525124 Application Reference No.241010135473, dated 04.09.2024 without reference to the pendency of the criminal case in the interest of justice."

2. Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the

petitioner and Smt.T.Suhasini, learned Standing Counsel for

respondents.

3. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the

writ petition is being disposed of at the stage of admission.

4. After hearing learned counsel appearing for the petitioner

as well as the respondents, it appears that the issue was

considered by 2 Co-ordinate Benches in W.P.Nos.8697 of 2023

and 22218 of 2024. Both the learned Single Judges referred the

Hon'ble Supreme Court Judgment in Vangala Kasturi

Rangacharyulu v. Central Bureau of Investigation 1 and

came to the finding that mere pendency of criminal case cannot

be a ground to decline the renewal/reissue of passport provided

that the petitioner is ready for renewal/reissue of passport. In

this case the petitioner is also ready to cooperate with the Trial

Court in concluding the trial and he is also willing to cooperate

with the pending proceedings. In Vangala Kasturi

Rangacharyulu (supra), the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that

the Passport Authority cannot refuse the release of passport on

the ground of pendency of criminal proceedings and accordingly

directed the Passport Authority to renew the passport of the

petitioner without raising objection relating to pendency of

criminal proceedings.

5. This Court is accordingly of the view that the Writ Petition

can be disposed of by directing the petitioner to submit a reply

to the letter dated 03.10.2024. The respondent No.2 shall

1 2020 Crl.L.J.(SC) 572

consider the reply submitted by the petitioner and take steps for

renewal of the passport in due compliance of the findings of the

Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vangala Kasturi Rangacharyulu

(supra). The directions are as follows:

(i) The petitioner shall submit an undertaking along with

an affidavit before the Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-

Special Judicial First Class Magistrate (Mobile) at

Kamareddy in C.C.No.275 of 2023 stating that the he will

not leave India during pendency of the C.C. without

permission of the Court and he will cooperate with the

Trial Court in concluding the criminal proceedings.

(ii) The Trial Court shall issue a certified copy of the

undertaking and affidavit within 2 weeks from the date of

filing of the undertaking.

(iii) The petitioner shall submit the certified copy of the

aforesaid undertaking along with the reply/ explanation

before the concerned Passport Officer for consideration of

his application for release of passport.

(iv) The Passport Authority shall consider the documents

in the light of the observations made by the Courts as well

as the undertaking and other documents filed by the

petitioner. The petitioner shall also be at liberty to rely on

the decisions in this regard. The petitioner shall deposit

the original passport before the trial Court in criminal case

for renewal of the passport. The petitioner shall at liberty

to file an application before the Additional Junior Civil

Judge-cum-Special Judicial First Class Magistrate (Mobile)

at Kamareddy seeking permission to travel outside India

and the learned Magistrate, shall consider the same in

accordance with law.

6. With the above observations, the Writ Petition is disposed

of. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ

petition shall stand closed. There shall be order as to costs.

_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J

Date: 06.02.2025 Note: Issue CC in two days b/o vsl

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter