Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The State Rep. Before Stat, Hyd. vs M/S. The Indian Hume Pipes Company Ltd., ...
2025 Latest Caselaw 4876 Tel

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 4876 Tel
Judgement Date : 25 August, 2025

Telangana High Court

The State Rep. Before Stat, Hyd. vs M/S. The Indian Hume Pipes Company Ltd., ... on 25 August, 2025

Author: P.Sam Koshy
Bench: P.Sam Koshy
     THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
                     AND
           THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE
            SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO

                     TREVC No.80 OF 2009

JUDGMENT:

(per Hon'ble Sri Justice P.Sam Koshy)

Heard Mr. T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant

Government Pleader representing the learned Special Government

Pleader for the State Tax for the petitioner/State and Mr. Tarun

Chadha, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Karthik Ramana,

learned counsel for the respondent. Perused the record.

2. The challenge in the instant tax revision case is to the order

passed by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal (STAT), Andhra

Pradesh, Hyderabad in T.A.No.1177/2004/A, decided on

17.11.2008.

3. The question of law raised was whether a second revision is

available with the Revisional Authority under Section 20(2) of the

Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax, 1957.

4. It has been brought to the notice of this Court that the said

issue has already been considered by this High Court in the case

of STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH vs. SRI PANDURANGA

RICE MILL CONTRACTORS CO., GUDLAVALLERU,

KRISHNA DISTRICT 1.

5. Similar issue also came up before this High Court in the

recent past in TREVC No.105 of 2009 which stood decided on

10.04.2025 where the TREVC was dismissed in the light of the

judgment of this High Court in the case of Sri Panduranga Rice

Mill Contractors (supra).

6. In view of the aforesaid judicial precedent, we find that the

question of law raised by the petitioner/State is not sustainable

and the tax revision case, accordingly, stands rejected, affirming

the order passed by the Tribunal. There shall be no order as to

costs.

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall

stand closed.

_____________________ P.SAM KOSHY, J

_________________________________ SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO, J 25.08.2025 Lrkm/Ggd

(1997) 24 APSTJ 247

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter