Sunday, 10, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Madhura Estates, vs P Karunakar
2024 Latest Caselaw 3196 Tel

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 3196 Tel
Judgement Date : 9 August, 2024

Telangana High Court

M/S Madhura Estates, vs P Karunakar on 9 August, 2024

       THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO

          CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.775 of 2019

ORDER:

This revision petition is filed aggrieved by the docket

orders dated 08.02.2019 and 01.03.2019 passed by the

II Additional District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at

L.B.Nagar, in E.P.No.10 of 2013 in O.S.No.235 of 2005.

2. Heard Sri Mohammed Nawaz Hyder Ali, learned counsel,

representing M/s.Pillix Law Firm, learned counsel for the

petitioners. In spite of service of notice, the respondent has

not chosen to enter appearance.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

respondent filed suit in O.S.No.235 of 2005 for recovery of

amount and the same was decreed on 05.09.2012. Aggrieved

by the same, the revision petitioners have filed A.S.No.201 of

2014, wherein this Court has granted interim stay subject to

deposit of an amount of Rs.6,00,000/- along with suits costs

on or before 15.07.2014 in A.S.M.P.No.882 of 2014, vide its

order dated 28.04.2014. Pursuant to the said order, the

revision petitioners have deposited the said amount.

3.1. He further submits that even prior to filing of A.S.No.201

of 2014, pursuant to the decree, respondent-decree holder filed

E.P.No.10 of 2013 before the II-Additional District Judge,

Ranga Reddy District, for execution of the decree and in the

said E.P., the petitioners have filed copy of the stay order

granted by this Court in A.S.M.P.No.882 of 2014 dated

28.04.2014. In spite of the same, the Execution Court has

passed the impugned docket orders dated 08.02.2019 and

01.03.2019, alleging that the above said interim granted by

this Court in A.S.M.P.No.882 of 2014 is valid only for a period

of six (6) months and it is deemed to be vacated, without giving

any reasons and the same is contrary to law.

4. Having considered the rival submissions made by the

learned counsel for the petitioners and after perusal of the

material available on record, it reveals that the revision

petitioners have filed A.S.No.201 of 2014 before this Court,

aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.235 of

2005 on the file of the II Additional District Judge, Ranga

Reddy District at L.B.Nagar, wherein this Court has granted

interim stay on 28.04.2014 subject to deposit of Rs.6,00,000/-

along with suit costs. Pursuant to the same, the petitioners

have deposited the said amount and the above said interim

stay granted by this Court is continuing. The Execution Court

without taking into consideration the stay granted by this

Court has passed cryptic order on 08.02.2019, which reads as

follows:

"Memo filed that Stay was granted. Such stay is granted in 2014. Now, it is deemed to be vacated. Call on 01.03.2019."

5. It is pertinent to mention here that the Hon'ble Apex

Court in Asian Resurfacing of Road Agency Pvt. Ltd. And

another v. Central Bureau of Investigation 1 held that the

interim stay granted by the High Courts in pending trial

matters in civil and criminal cases is valid for a period of six (6)

months and the said principle is not applicable to the present

case on the ground that this Court granted interim stay in the

appeal i.e., A.S.No.201 of 2014.

6. It is relevant to place on record that during pendency of

the revision petition, the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble

Apex Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v.

State of Uttar Pradesh and others 2, held that in all pending

matters before the High Court or other Courts relating to the

civil or criminal cases where stay is operating in pending trials,

the said stay orders do not automatically vacated after lapse of

(2018) 16 SCC 299

(2024) 6 SCC 267

six months and the principle laid in Asian Resurfacing supra

is overruled.

7. For the foregoing reasons and in view of the principle laid

down in the above said judgments supra, the impugned docket

orders dated 08.02.2019 and 01.03.2019 is liable to be set

aside.

8. Accordingly, the civil revision petition is allowed. No

costs.

Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand

closed.

_______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 09.08.2024.

mar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter