Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kolluri Venkateshwarlu vs The State Of Telangana
2023 Latest Caselaw 1939 Tel

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1939 Tel
Judgement Date : 4 September, 2023

Telangana High Court
Kolluri Venkateshwarlu vs The State Of Telangana on 4 September, 2023
Bench: T.Vinod Kumar
              THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

                      Writ Petition No.21490 of 2023

ORDER:

In this Writ Petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated

02.09.2022, by which, the 3rd respondent had issued a Shortfall Intimation

Letter (for short, 'SIL'), pursuant to the application submitted by the petitioner

on 23.08.2022 for permission to construct a house in Plot bearing No.W-13

admeasuring 333 square yards in Survey Nos.329/4 and 329/5 situated at

Mahadevapuram Residential Project Phase - III, Gajularamaram Village,

Quthbullapur Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Government Pleader

for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for

respondent No.1 and learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of

respondent Nos.2 to 4 and with their consent, the Writ Petition is taken up for

hearing and disposal at the stage of admission.

3. Petitioner contends that he is the owner of Plot bearing No.W-13

admeasuring 333 square yards in Survey Nos.329/4 and 329/5 situated at

Mahadevapuram Residential Project Phase - III, Gajularamaram Village,

having acquired the same under a registered sale deed dated 24.02.2005.

Petitioner further contends that he intended to construct a residential building

in the said plot of land and had approached the respondent authorities by

submitting an application on 23.08.2022.

4. It is further contended that upon the petitioner making the application

to the authorities concerned, the petitioner has been issued with the impugned

proceeding titled as 'Shortfall Intimation Letter' dated 02.09.2022, wherein

multiple shortfalls have been noted and the petitioner was directed to comply

with the objections noted therein within 15 days from the date of

communication of the same.

5. Petitioner contends that while the petitioner would comply with various

objections noted in the SIL, he is aggrieved by Objection No.2, which reads as

under:

         Sl.No.    Documents Name                  Remarks

         1.              ....                                       ....

         2.       LRS Proceedings/approved      1) As per the Prohibited property
                  layout & plan copy for        list, the Sy.No.329/4 & 5 is falling
                  approved     plots/previous   Govt Land and also there are court
                  permission copy.              cases pending in said Sy.No.329 of
                                                Gajularamaram Village. Hence,
                                                required NOC from the competent
                                                authority i.e. the District Collector.

                                                2) To submit the original scanned
                                                copy of approved LRS proceedings
                                                and plans.

                                                3) To submit the katcha layout
                                                copy earmarking the proposed site
                                                and master plan road.



6. Petitioner contends that insofar as the above said objection/shortfall

noted in the impugned proceeding, this Court had an occasion to consider the

same in W.P.No.43031 of 2022 dated 01.12.2022. In the said judgment, while

considering the application for grant of building permission, this Court had

held as to what aspects need to be looked into while granting building

permission.

7. It is also contended that the Writ Appeal, being W.A.No.155 of 2023,

preferred by the Municipal Authorities against the order of the learned Single

Judge in W.P.No.43031 of 2022 dated 01.12.2022, had also been dismissed,

vide judgment dated 03.02.2023. It is further contended that the petitioner

stands on the same footing as that of the petitioner in the above said case,

and therefore, the shortfall/objection No.2, as noted above, holds no water.

8. Learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.2 to

4, while referring to the counter-affidavit filed in the matter, submits that

insofar as objection No.2/shortfall noted in SIL is concerned, the same is no

longer res integra, in the light of the decision of the Division Bench of this

Court in W.A.No.155 of 2023. However, learned Standing Counsel would

submit that notwithstanding the said objection, the petitioner is required to

comply with all other shortfalls noted in the SIL dated 02.09.2022

9. Learned Standing Counsel would further submit that since much time

has elapsed after issuing the SIL, the application submitted by the petitioner

on 23.08.2022 is no more subsisting and the petitioner is required to make a

fresh application which will be considered by the authorities concerned afresh

without insisting on production of No-Objection Certification from the

competent authority i.e. District Collector, since the said issue has been settled

by virtue of the decision of the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.155 of

2023.

10. At this stage, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that

the petitioner would comply with the other objections raised in the SIL, if the

application submitted by him earlier has not been closed by the authorities and

in case of its closure, he would make a fresh application enclosing therewith all

the relevant documents, including the shortfalls noted in the SIL, except NOC

from the District Collector.

11. Having regard to the submissions, made as above, this Court is of the

view that the petitioner can be directed to comply with the shortfalls as noted

in the SIL within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy

of this order, if the application submitted by him for building permission on

23.08.2022 has not been closed by the respondent authorities, by the said

date. In the event, the said application submitted by the petitioner has been

closed, he is granted liberty to make a fresh application excluding the NOC

from the competent authority i.e. District Collector, and upon the petitioner

making fresh application, the respondent authorities shall consider the same in

accordance with law, without insisting on production of NOC from the District

Collector.

12. Subject to the above liberty and directions, the Writ Petition is disposed

of. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits

of the other objections. No order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand

closed.

___________________ T. VINOD KUMAR, J Date:04.09.2023

Note:

Furnish CC by 06.09.2023.

(B/o) GJ

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR

Writ Petition No.21490 of 2023

04.09.2023

GJ

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter