Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1559 Tel
Judgement Date : 28 March, 2022
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI
COMMERCIAL COURT APPEAL No.6 of 2022
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
The present appeal is arising out of an order, dated
10.03.2022 passed in C.O.P.No.12 of 2022 by the Principal Special
Court in the cadre of District Judge for Trial and Disposal of
Commercial Disputes at Hyderabad, on an application preferred
under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
The facts of the case reveal that I.Q.Technologies, petitioner
before the trial Court, has entered into an agreement on 16.08.2021
with M/s.Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited, appellant herein
and it is a services agreement. The terms and conditions of the
aforesaid agreement for rendering the services are reproduced as
under:-
(i) Services pertaining to functionality enhancements,
maintenance, hosting of application and database, server
and storage architecture, networking, security, platform
management, disaster recovery, MIS including pay roll,
business intelligence, advanced data visualization,
application and data base;
(ii) Build an ERP/Application for the benefit of the
respondents;
(iii) Maintenance of the application and data for the respondents to ensure the smooth functioning of the business of the respondents.
The IQ Technologies/petitioner has agreed to provide all
services under the same services agreement to M/s.Criss Financial
Limited/respondent No.2 herein, the wholly owned subsidiary of
M/s.Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited/appellant herein on
similar terms as provided under the Services Agreement.
The petitioner, as stated in the petition under Section 9 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, is required to provide
multiple services pertaining to loan restructuring, excess interest
calculation, interest capitalization and collection module
restructuring apart from building new functionalities and to
complete some incomplete modules of M/s.Spandana Sphoorty
Financial Limited/appellant herein. A serious dispute arose between
the parties and the agreement between the parties provides for
dispute resolution mechanism.
Clause 16 of the aforesaid agreement between the parties is
reproduced as under:-
"16. Dispute Resolution
a. Any dispute(s) arising out of this Agreement shall, as far as possible, be settled amicably between the Parties hereto failing which the following shall apply:
b. Any dispute under this Agreement shall be referred to arbitration by a sole arbitrator to be appointed jointly by the Parties.
c. The Arbitration Proceedings shall be held in Hyderabad in accordance with the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 or any statutory re-enactment or modification thereof for the time being in force.
d. The Parties agree that the arbitration award shall be final and may be enforced as a decree. e. The Parties further agree that subject to the above only the competent courts at Hyderabad shall have jurisdiction in all matters arising hereunder. f. The Parties further agree to keep the arbitration proceedings and arbitral award confidential."
The petitioner has raised various invoices from time to time
and as the amount was not being paid to the petitioner, legal notice
was served on 07.01.2022 and the petitioner came to know that
M/s.Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited/appellant herein have
started looking out for other vendors. As per the petition, an
amount of Rs.6,89,42,680/- (Rupees six crore eighty nine lakh forty
two thousand six hundred and eighty only) was outstanding by
M/s.Spandana Sphoorty Financial Limited/appellant herein and a
prayer was made for attachment of two bank accounts, one with the
State Bank of India and another with the Kotak Mahindra Bank.
The application was preferred under Section 9 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 and the trial Court in order to safeguard the
interest of the petitioner has attached only one bank account till
24.03.2002, which is with the State Bank of India. The order passed
by the Court below is an ex parte order and a notice was also issued
returnable by 24.03.2022. The M/s.Spandana Sphoorty Financial
Limited/appellant herein instead of filing a reply to the application
filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
or filing an application for vacating the stay has rushed to this court
and the fact remains that the trial Court has granted only an
ex parte interim order. It is certainly open for M/s.Spandana
Sphoorty Financial Limited/appellant herein to raise all the grounds
raised in the present appeal before the trial Court. At this juncture,
it has been brought to the notice of this Court that the appellant
has already marked its presence before the trial Court and the
matter has to be heard.
In the considered opinion of this Court, as the matter has to
be heard on merits by the trial Court, this Court is refraining itself
from passing any order on merits and the present appeal stands
disposed of giving liberty to the parties to approach this Court after
an order is passed in the matter by the trial Court. At this juncture,
this Court does not find any reason to interfere with the order
passed by the trial Court. The trial Court is directed to hear both
the parties and to pass an order as expeditiously as possible
preferably within a period of thirty (30) days from the date of receipt
of a certified copy of this order.
The Commercial Court Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
_______________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J 28.03.2022 pln
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!