Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bejugam Bhadraiah, Husnabad Vm, ... vs The State Of A.P., Rep. By P.P., ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 3744 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3744 Tel
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2022

Telangana High Court
Bejugam Bhadraiah, Husnabad Vm, ... vs The State Of A.P., Rep. By P.P., ... on 15 July, 2022
Bench: Juvvadi Sridevi
      THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUVVADI SRIDEVI

        CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.416 of 2010

ORDER:

The present Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections

397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.),

against the judgment dated 14.12.2009 passed in Criminal

Appeal No.105 of 2009, by the learned Sessions Judge,

Karimnagar, confirming the order dated 22.08.2009 passed in

File No.G3/906/2009, by the Joint Collector, Karimnagar, but

directed to release 19.50 quintals of rice, 2.50 quintals of Red

gram, 1.25 quintals of green gram, 1.00 quintal of Horse gram,

1.30 quintals of Pease and 2.00 quintals of sugar to the

petitioner, however, directed to confiscate 50% of the seized

stock of 1660 liters of edible oil to the State.

2. The facts of the case are as under:

The petitioner is running Kirana shop in the name and

style of Devi Kirana Shop in house bearing D.No.11-30 located

Husnabad village. On receipt of credible information that he is

indulging clandestine business, the Civil Supply Officials made

surprise visit of his shop on 06.06.2009 and seized 19.50

quintals of rice, 2.50 quintals of Red gram, 1.25 quintals of

green gram, 1.00 quintal of Horse gram, 1.30 quintals of Pease

and 2.00 quintals of sugar and 1660 liters of edible oil, in all

worth Rs.1,69,455/- as he is not having licence under A.P.S.C.D

A.P.S.C.D. Licensing (Storage and Regulation) Order 2008 and

the said stock is seized in the presence of mediators under a

cover of panchanama and booked a case under Section 6-A of

Essential Commodities Act, 1955. After the seizure, the Joint

Collector ordered for confiscation of 50% of the seized stock to

the Government.

Aggrieved by the seizure and the sale, the appellant

herein filed W.P.No.12323 of 2009 and obtained direction

directing the Joint Collector to dispose of the application filed by

the petitioner before proceeding with the sale of seized stock.

Accordingly the Joint Collector, after submission of the

explanation by the appellant passed the impugned order, dated

22.08.2009 confiscating 50% seized stock in favour of the

Government.

The learned Sessions Judge, by judgment, dated

14.12.2009, directed to release 19.50 quintals of rice, 2.50

quintals of Red gram, 1.25 quintals of green gram, 1.00 quintal

of Horse gram, 1.30 quintals of Pease and 2.00 quintals of

sugar to the petitioner, however, directed to confiscate 50% of

the seized stock of 1660 liters of edible oil to the State.

Aggrieved by the same, the present revision is preferred by the

petitioner.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner Sri

A.Prabhakar Rao and learned Assistant Public Prosecutor

representing for the respondent-state and perused the material

available on record.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

quantum of confiscation ordered by the Collector, and reduced

by the lower appellate Court, may further be reduced to 10%.

5. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State,

however, does not dispute reduction in percentage of seized

stock.

6. On a perusal of the material available on record, it is

obvious that the petitioner has not obtained license for selling

the edible oil, which is incorporated in the list of Essential

Commodities Act. On appreciation of facts and circumstances of

the case, the appellate Court having observed that the

confiscation of the edible oil ordered by the Joint Collector is

excessive and disproportionate to the violation alleged, modified

the order of the Joint Collector by reducing the confiscation of

edible oil from 100% to 50%. This Court finds no illegality or

irregularity in the judgment passed by the lower appellate

Court. But however, to meet the ends of justice and in the

circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to reduce the

said confiscation of edible oil from 50% to 10%.

7. With the above modification, the Criminal Revision Case is

disposed of.

8. Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,

shall stand closed.

_________________ JUVVADI SRIDEVI, J Date: 15.07.2022 Kvsn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter