Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 69 Tel
Judgement Date : 5 January, 2022
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.6238 OF 2016
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioners called absent. No
representation.
Learned counsel for the respondents/plaintiffs submits that
the original suit was disposed of in the year 2014 itself.
On verification of the records, it is found that the present
civil revision petition is preferred against the order dated
13.12.2016 passed in I.A.No.856 of 2016 in O.S.No.1324 of 2014,
which was filed with a request to suspend the operation of the ex
parte judgment and decree dated 31.12.2014 in O.S.No.1324 of
2014.
As there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners
on 23.12.2021, the Registry was directed to list the matter today
only to give a fair opportunity to the petitioners. In the absence of
representation on behalf of the petitioners, I find no merit to
adjourn the matter.
In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed for
default for non-prosecution.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any,
shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________________________ A. VENKATESHWARA REDDY, J
05.01.2022 JSU
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!