Tuesday, 12, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Uppununthala Narayana vs Bandari Satish And 2 Others
2022 Latest Caselaw 353 Tel

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 353 Tel
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2022

Telangana High Court
Uppununthala Narayana vs Bandari Satish And 2 Others on 31 January, 2022
Bench: Satish Chandra Sharma, Abhinand Kumar Shavili
   THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA
                                             AND
        THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

                        WRIT APPEAL No.155 OF 2020

JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)

        The present writ appeal is arising out of the order dated

05.02.2020

passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.No.2330 of

2020.

The undisputed facts of the case reveal that the appellant

before this Court, as stated by him, is the owner of land in Survey

No.7LU, to an extent of Ac.1.00, situated at Tandra Village,

Kalwakurthy Mandal, Nagarkurnool District and the writ petition

was preferred by Bandari Satish stating that a sale deed was

executed in his favour and he has submitted an application on

10.07.2019 in Form-6A of the A.P.Rights in land and Pattadar

Passbooks Act, 1971 for mutation. A prayer was made before the

learned Single Judge to direct the Tahsildar to pass appropriate

order in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the appellant has argued before this

Court that he is, in fact, the owner of the subject property and at

no point of time, the property was sold by him and he has also filed

a Civil Suit in O.S.No.225 of 2019 and therefore, he was a

necessary party.

This Court has carefully gone through the impugned order

passed by the learned Single Judge. The learned Single Judge has

simply directed the Tahsildar to pass appropriate order on the

application submitted by the writ petitioner, namely Bandari

Satish.

Resultantly, without adverting to the merits of the case, the

present writ appeal stands disposed of with a direction to the

Tahsildar to hear all the necessary parties, including the present

appellant, while passing a final order in the matter.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand

closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ

_______________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J

31.01.2022 JSU

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter