Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 578 Tel
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2022
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
CRIMINAL PETITION No. 779 of 2022
O R D E R:
This Criminal Petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. is
filed by the petitioner - State seeking cancellation of bail granted to
the respondents - Accused Nos. 2 and 4 in Criminal Petition No.
7398 of 2021, dated 15.11.2021.
2. The accused are alleged to have committed the
offences punishable under Sections 364-A, 302, 201, 120-B IPC.
and Section 3(ii)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes
(Prevention of Atrocities) Act. As the charge sheet is not filed within
the statutory period as contemplated under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.,
this Court vide order dated 15.11.2021, granted bail to the
petitioners.
3. The learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that
the petitioners belong to the State of Uttar Pradesh and are
accused in several cases. As of now, they are languishing in jail
and if they are enlarged on bail, it would be very difficult for the
prosecution to secure their presence during the course of trial.
Further, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that in the
order dated 15.11.2021, at para 5, this Court had observed that
the petitioners are involved in more than eight cases and even if
bail is granted to them, they may not be released as they were
convicted in other cases and it is stated that it was not the
submission made by him and his contention is that the petitioners
jumped bail when they were granted bail in the State of Gujarat
and that contention was not recorded by this Court.
4. Be that as it may, the whole basis for this Court to
grant bail to the accused was not the submissions made by the
learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, but only on the ground that
even after lapse of 90 days, the prosecution failed to file charge
sheet and as contemplated under Section 167(2) CrP.C., they are
entitled for default bail, this Court categorically relying on the
judgment of the Apex Court in Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State
of Maharashtra1 granted bail to the petitioners. Hence, this Court
finds no reason to cancel the said bail.
5. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
___________________________ LALITHA KANNEGANTI, J 11th February 2022
ksld
(2001) 5 SCC 453
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!