Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 50 Sikkim
Judgement Date : 26 July, 2023
THE HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
(Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction)
Dated : 26th July, 2023
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
DIVISION BENCH : THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, JUDGE
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crl.A. No.14 of 2023
Appellant : Durga Singh Kami
versus
Respondent : State of Sikkim
Appeal under Section 374(2) of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Appearance
Mr. J. B. Pradhan, Senior Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) with Mr.
D. K. Siwakoti, Advocate (Legal Aid Counsel) for the Appellant.
Mr. S. K. Chettri, Additional Public Prosecutor with Ms. Pema
Bhutia, Assistant Public Prosecutor for the State-Respondent.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ORDER (ORAL)
Meenakshi Madan Rai, J.
1. Heard Learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant.
2. Issue Notice to the State-Respondent.
3. Mr. S. K. Chettri, Learned Additional Public Prosecutor
is present for the State-Respondent on advance Notice and waives
formal Notice.
4. We have been taken through the impugned Judgment
dated 18-05-2023, in Sessions Trial (POCSO) Case No.13 of 2022
(State of Sikkim vs. Durga Singh Kami) and the Order on Sentence
dated 18-05-2022 (sic), of the Learned Special Judge (POCSO),
West Sikkim, at Gyalshing, by Learned Senior Counsel for the
Appellant. We find that the Learned Trial Court has taken into and
given due and correct consideration to the evidence of the
Prosecution Witnesses i.e., the victims (P.W.1 and P.W.3) and the
Durga Singh Kami vs. State of Sikkim
mother of the victims (P.W.2) as also that of the School Head
Mistress (P.W.9) and the Panchayat President (P.W.12).
5. We find that the evidence furnished is cogent and
convincing and that the act of the Appellant against the victims,
have been proved beyond reasonable doubt by the Prosecution
evidence.
6. In such circumstances, we are of the considered
opinion that the impugned Judgment and Order on Sentence
warrants no interference.
7. Consequently, the Appeal stands dismissed and
disposed of accordingly.
( Bhaskar Raj Pradhan ) ( Meenakshi Madan Rai )
Judge Judge
26-07-2023 26-07-2023
ds/bp/sdl
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!