Friday, 01, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ramesh Rai And Ors vs State Of Sikkim And Ors
2022 Latest Caselaw 3 Sikkim

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 3 Sikkim
Judgement Date : 17 February, 2022

Sikkim High Court
Ramesh Rai And Ors vs State Of Sikkim And Ors on 17 February, 2022
Bench: Hon'Ble The Justice, Meenakshi Madan Rai
                                                                       COURT NO.1
                       HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK
                              Record of Proceedings



                            WP(PIL) No.09/2021

RAMESH RAI AND ORS.                                          PETITIONER(S)
                                    VERSUS
STATE OF SIKKIM & ORS.                                       RESPONDENT (S)


For Petitioner          :     Mr. B. Sharma, Sr. Advocate.
                              Mr. Sajal Sharma, Advocate.


For Respondents no.     :     Dr. Doma T. Bhutia, Addl. Advocate General.
1 to 4                        Mr. S.K. Chettri, Govt. Advocate.


For Respondent no.5     :     Mr. Sudesh Joshi, Advocate.
                              Ms. Gazala Parvin, Advocate.


Date: 17/02/2022

CORAM:
    HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BISWANATH SOMADDER, CHIEF JUSTICE
    HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI MADAN RAI, JUDGE
                             ...

JUDGMENT: (per the Hon'ble, the Chief Justice)

The only issue which arises for consideration in the instant Public Interest

Litigation is whether the local residents of Namchi are being deprived of use of a

playground in view of construction of a 300 bedded district hospital in an area

which was being used as temporary playground.

The answer to this issue is in paragraphs 14 and 26 of the counter

affidavit filed on behalf of the State respondents. For convenience, paragraphs

14 and 26 of the said counter affidavit are reproduced hereinbelow:-

"14. It is further submitted that Government has already taken care of sports, therefore, Bhaichung Stadium has constructed and completed, which is of international standard and same can be utilized by the people for the purpose of health activities, besides football tournament, there is no bar. In addition to that State Government has allotted 3.822 acres of land at Boomtar Namchi for utilization of public purpose of sports etc.

x x x

COURT NO.1 HIGH COURT OF SIKKIM : GANGTOK Record of Proceedings

26. That the contents of paragraph- 50 of the writ Petition are matters of record and it is submitted that the Bhaichung Bhutia Stadium which is meant for sports activities, its construction has been completed and the said stadium is also being used by the public of Namchi Bazaar and as well as by the public of in and around vicinity of Namchi, South Sikkim."

Since it is clear from a plain reading of the two paragraphs, as quoted

above, that the Bhaichung Stadium can be used by the general public for the

purpose of health activities besides football tournaments and in addition to that

the State Government has allotted 3.822 acres of land in Boomtar, Namchi, for

utilization of public purpose of sports, etc., we do not find any cogent and/or

justifiable reason to keep the instant Public Interest Litigation pending, which

stands disposed of accordingly.




                 (Meenakshi Madan Rai)                      (Biswanath Somadder)
                        Judge                                    Chief Justice
jk/ds/avi





 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter