Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4588 Raj
Judgement Date : 25 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:14014]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5068/2026
Punanath S/o Bhanwar Nath, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Harima,
Tehsil And District Nagaur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department
Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2. District Collector, Nagaur.
3. Additional District Collector, Nagaur.
4. M/s. Jsw Cement Limited, Registered Office, Jsw Centre,
Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai 400051,
Maharastra, India Cement Production And Lime Stone,
Mines Patta, 3B2, Lime Stone Block, N/v Sarasani Tehsil
And District Nagaur, Through Executive Officer Varindra
Singh Saini S/o Sardar Mohan Singh Saini, Hoshiyarpur,
Punjab, Associate Vice President, Jsw Cement Limited, At
Present Spais Hotel, First Flor, B.r. Mirgh, Opposite
Government College, Nagaur, Tehsil And District Nagaur,
Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manohar Singh Rathore
Mr. Satya Prakaash Sharma
Mr. Girdhari Lal Prajapat
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Akshay Nagori
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT
Order
25/03/2026
1. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to be
issued to the respondents to undertake the acquisition
proceedings as per the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation
and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and
Resettlement Act, 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 06:46:48 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14014] (2 of 3) [CW-5068/2026]
2013') and for quashing of proceedings initiated by the
respondent-Company, pending before Court of Additional District
Collector, Nagaur under Section 89 of the Rajasthan Land Revenue
Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act of 1956').
2. While considering the facts of said case, this Court found that
the main prayer made in the writ petition is for grant of
compensation as per the provisions of Act of 2013. This Court vide
order dated 26.02.2026 in SB Civil Writ Petition No.4503/2026
directed the parties to remain present before the District Collector,
Nagaur on 09.03.2026 at 12.00 pm for settlement of amount of
compensation, as per the provisions of Act of 2013. In pursuance
of the said directions, the computation of compensation was
presented before this Court, however, petitioner has refused to
accept the same.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as a matter
of fact the proceedings initiated under Section 89 of the Act of
1956 are not maintainable.
4. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the
application filed under Section 89 of the Act of 1956 for allotment
of the land in question is pending consideration before the
Additional District Collector, Nagaur, however, no objection has
been filed by the petitioner so far and, therefore, his writ petition
is premature.
5. Learned counsels for the petitioner are not in a position to
dispute the aforesaid submissions.
6. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed
as premature. However, the petitioner is at liberty to submit his
objection in the pending acquisition proceedings under the
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 06:46:48 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:14014] (3 of 3) [CW-5068/2026]
provisions of the Act of 1956. Since the issue of allotment of land
relates to development project/project of larger importance, if
such objections are filed, the same shall be decided expeditiously
and in accordance with law.
7. Stay application and all pending application(s) are also
disposed of.
(SANJEET PUROHIT),J 117-Arjun/-
(Uploaded on 25/03/2026 at 06:46:48 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!