Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4495 Raj
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:13953]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2474/2011
Mahaveer Chand Jain S/o Shri Ratan Lal Jain, R/o Suraj Bhawan
Behind Public Park, Near Rawat Hotel, Jodhpur (Owner Indica
Car)
----Appellant
Versus
1. Kumari Rashmi D/o Late Shri Gautam Surana, Aged About 3
Years,
2. Smt. Kamala W/o Shri Nemi Chand, Aged About 59 Years,
3. Nemi Chand S/o Shri Bakhtawar Mal, Aged About 62 Years,
Appellant No.1 minor through her natural guardian mother Smt.
Kamala W/o Shri Nemi Chand,
All are R/o Dhara Ka Bas, Near Jain School, Mahamandir,
Jodhpur. (claimants)
4. Shri Prahlad Bhogate S/o Shri Mahadev Bhogate, R/o 8/1/A,
Narkeldanga Main Road, Koltaka, West Bengal (Driver of Truck)
5. Shri Ramesh Singh Bakshi S/o Shri K. Singh Bakshi, R/o
Kumar Road Lines, Chokara Nala, Raipur, Chhatisgarh (owner of
Truck)
6. The New India Assurance Company Ltd. Divisional Office-I,
Abhay Chambers, Jalori Gate, Jodhpur. (Insurer of Truck)
7. Shri Murli Manohar Gehlot S/o Shri Vallabh Gehlot, R/o Shri
Narayan Ji Ka Temple, Hati Ram Ka Odha, Jodhpur (Driver Indica
Car)
8. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd. Registered
Office at ICICI Bank Towers, Bandra Kurla, Complex, Bandra
(East) Mumbai, Maharastra (Insurer Indica Car)
----Respondent
For Appellant(s) : Mr. Dron Kaushik
For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.K. Sankhla for claimant
Mr. Jagdish Chandra Vyas for
respondent No.8
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
Order
24/03/2026
The instant appeal has been filed by the owner of the Indica
Car against the judgment and award dated 18.12.2008 passed by
learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (First), Jodhpur in
(Uploaded on 27/03/2026 at 10:42:43 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:13953] (2 of 3) [CMA-2474/2011]
MAC Case No.328/2005, whereby the learned Tribunal has
awarded a sum of Rs.4,38,000/- in favour of the claimants and it
was directed that the insurance company shall pay the amount
and recover the same from the owner of the vehicle.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that they have
entered into a memorandum of understanding and with the
consent of parties, it is agreed that the present appeal shall be
disposed of on the condition that the insurance company shall not
recover any amount from the appellant pursuant to the impugned
award and the insurance company shall withdraw the execution
proceedings, if not already withdrawn.
In view of the memorandum of settlement as jointly filed by
both the parties, in the spirit of Lok Adalat, the present appeal be
disposed of.
In view of above, the appeal is partly allowed and the
impugned order is modified to the extent that the insurance
company shall not recover any amount from the appellant (owner
of Indica Car) pursuant to the impugned award. the insurance
company shall withdraw the execution proceedings, if not already
withdrawn.
It is further directed that the amount deposited in pursuance
to proviso under Section 173(1) of MV Act be returned back to the
appellant, if not already withdrawn by the insurance company/
claimant, on filing appropriate application.
The appeal stands disposed of in above terms. The
memorandum of understanding is taken on record.
(Uploaded on 27/03/2026 at 10:42:43 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:13953] (3 of 3) [CMA-2474/2011]
Stay petition and all pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed of.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 235-Ramesh/-
(Uploaded on 27/03/2026 at 10:42:43 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!