Saturday, 16, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ranjeet Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:12785)
2026 Latest Caselaw 4092 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 4092 Raj
Judgement Date : 17 March, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Ranjeet Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:12785) on 17 March, 2026

Author: Farjand Ali
Bench: Farjand Ali
[2026:RJ-JD:12785]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
               S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1124/2026

Ranjeet Singh S/o Masra Ram, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Village
Khirodi, Post Aakoli, Tehsil Chitalwana, District Jalore.at Present
Lodged In Central Rol Jail. Jodhpur. Through His Father Masra
Ram Purohit, Aged About 61 Years, Resident Of Village Khirodi,
Post Aakoli, Tehsil Chitalwana, District Jalore .
                                                                    ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
1.       State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary, Department
         Of Home, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       The District Collector, Jodhpur
3.       The Superintendent, Central Jail Jodhpur.
4.       The District Collector, Jalore
                                                                 ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)         :     Ms. Komal R. Verma
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Shriram Choudhary, AGA



                HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE FARJAND ALI

Order

17/03/2026

1. The present writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the

petitioner-convict seeking grant of emergent parole for the limited

purpose of enabling him to appear in the B.A. (First Semester)

Examination conducted by Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur,

scheduled between 12.03.2026 and 04.04.2026, with the next

examination stated to be on 18.03.2026.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner

is a student and has duly filled the examination form. The admit

card as well as the examination schedule have been placed on

record as Annex.1. It is urged that denial of parole would result in

(Uploaded on 17/03/2026 at 05:49:04 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:12785] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1124/2026]

the petitioner being deprived of the opportunity to appear in the

examination, thereby causing irreparable prejudice to his

academic progress.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor, though opposed the prayer, but

does not dispute the factum of the petitioner having applied for

and being permitted to appear in the aforesaid examination.

4. Having considered the submissions advanced at the Bar and

upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court finds

that the factum of the petitioner's appearance in the examination

stands duly substantiated from the documents placed on record.

The right to pursue education, even during incarceration, is a facet

of reformative jurisprudence and denial of such opportunity, in the

absence of any overriding adverse circumstance, would result in

avoidable prejudice. The prayer is limited in duration and purpose

and can be adequately safeguarded by imposing appropriate

conditions.

5. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered view that the

petitioner has made out a case for grant of limited emergent

parole, strictly for the purpose of enabling him to appear in the

aforesaid examination. However, it is made clear that this order is

being passed in the peculiar facts of the case and shall not be

treated as a precedent.

6. Consequently, the writ petition is allowed. It is ordered that

the petitioner shall be released forthwith on emergent parole for a

period upto 10.04.2026 upon furnishing a personal bond in the

sum of Rs.50,000/- along with one surety in the like amount to

(Uploaded on 17/03/2026 at 05:49:04 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:12785] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1124/2026]

the satisfaction of the Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur. The

petitioner shall surrender before the jail authorities on 11.04.2026

in the morning. During the period of parole, the petitioner shall

remain within the jurisdiction as may be specified by the

Superintendent of Jail and shall not misuse the liberty so granted.

The petitioner shall not involve himself in any criminal activity and

shall maintain good conduct during the period of parole. The

Superintendent, Central Jail, Jodhpur shall be at liberty to impose

such further reasonable conditions as may be deemed necessary

to ensure the petitioner's return to custody upon expiry of the

parole period.

7. It is made clear that in case of breach of any of the

conditions, the respondents shall be at liberty to take appropriate

action in accordance with law.

(FARJAND ALI),J 1-Pramod/-

(Uploaded on 17/03/2026 at 05:49:04 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter