Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chen Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:11622)
2026 Latest Caselaw 3647 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 3647 Raj
Judgement Date : 10 March, 2026

[Cites 6, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Chen Singh vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:11622) on 10 March, 2026

[2026:RJ-JD:11622]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
  S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 1405/2026

Chen Singh S/o Shri Lal, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Village
Khalukhedi, Maliyan, Police Station Manohar Thana, District
Jhalawad (Raj)
(At Present Lodged At District Jail Udaipur)
                                                                   ----Petitioner
                                    Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through PP
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Petitioner(s)         :     Mr. Mahaveer Singh
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. Narendra Singh Chandawat, PP



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

10/03/2026 The instant 2nd application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS

(439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been

arrested in the present matter. The requisite details of the matter

are tabulated herein below:

S. No.                    Particulars of the case

   2.     Police Station              Saira, Udaipur
   3.     District                    Udaipur

4. Offences alleged in the FIR Under Section 87 of the BNS

5. Offences added, if any Under Sections 64(2)(m) & 127(4) of BNS

The 1st bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner i.e.

S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.12719/2025 was dismissed

as not pressed by this Court vide order dated 13.11.2025 with a

liberty to the petitioner to file fresh bail application after filing of

(Uploaded on 10/03/2026 at 06:17:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:11622] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-1405/2026]

the charge-sheet. After rejection of 1 st bail application, charge-

sheet has been filed, hence, this 2nd bail application has been filed.

It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the

petitioner is aged about 30 years whereas the age of the victim is

around 20 years. The petitioner and the victim were having

consensual relationship and they were living together. A live-in-

relationship agreement was also got executed between them

which was duly signed by the victim herself. It is further

submitted that in the statement of the victim recorded under

Section 183 of BNSS, victim stated that she left her house out of

her own will and has further stated that she travelled to various

public places with the petitioner, however, she did not make any

hue and cry or tried to escape. It is submitted that after some

time, when their relations got strained, the allegations of rape was

levelled against the petitioner.

Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in custody

since 18.09.2025 and the trial of the case will take sufficiently

long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the

accused-petitioner.

Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail

application and submitted that looking to the allegation levelled

against the petitioner, he may not be enlarged on bail. However,

he is not in a position to refute the fact that there is a live-in-

relationship agreement, executed between the petitioner and the

victim.

Having heard and considered the rival submissions, facts and

circumstances of the case as well as perused the material

(Uploaded on 10/03/2026 at 06:17:39 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:11622] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-1405/2026]

available on record, considering the statement of victim recorded

under Section 183 of BNSS; more specifically the live-in-

agreement executed between the petitioner and the victim;

petitioner is in custody since 18.09.2025 and the trial of the case

will take significant time to conclude, without expressing any

opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to

enlarge the petitioner on bail.

Consequently, the 2nd bail application under Section 483 of

BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-

petitioner as named in the cause title, arrested in connection with

the above mentioned FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted

in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of

Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the

satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that

court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon

to do so till completion of the trial.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 190-Ramesh/-

(Uploaded on 10/03/2026 at 06:17:39 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter