Sunday, 17, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur vs Surya Prakash Sharma ...
2026 Latest Caselaw 775 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 775 Raj
Judgement Date : 19 January, 2026

[Cites 4, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur vs Surya Prakash Sharma ... on 19 January, 2026

Author: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
Bench: Pushpendra Singh Bhati
[2026:RJ-JD:3055-DB]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                   D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ No. 179/2024

1.       Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur, Through Its Registrar.
2.       The Registrar, Jai Narayan Vyas University, Jodhpur.
                                                                    ----Appellants
                                      Versus
Surya Prakash Sharma S/o Virendra Sharma, Aged About 28
Years, R/o House No. 11-A, Karmchari Colony, 8 Residency Road,
Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
                                                                   ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)            :     Mr. Yashpal Khileree for
                                  Mr. Deepesh Singh Beniwal
For Respondent(s)           :     Mr. Mohit Singh Choudhary



     HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP SHAH

Order

19/01/2026

1. Learned counsel for the parties have shown the order passed

by a learned Division Bench of this Court in D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ

No.153/2024, (Jai Narain Vyas University Jodhpur vs.

Ramesh Pandit), on 18.11.2024, which reads as follows:-

"Heard on prayer for stay.

Learned counsel for the appellants would submit that relief has been granted to the respondent-writ petitioners relying upon the order passed by this Court in the case of Lalit Gehlot & Ors. Vs. Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.5666/2022). The judgment of this Court in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra) has been challenged in the Hon'ble Supreme Court and vide common order dated 22.01.2024, the order passed in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra) has been stayed.

Learned counsel appearing for the respondents- writ petitioners in all these appeals except S.A.W. No.255/2024 would submit that though the Hon'ble Supreme Court has stayed the order passed in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra), there were earlier round of litigation and favourable orders have been passed in favour of the employees seeking regularization

(Uploaded on 20/01/2026 at 03:54:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:3055-DB] (2 of 3) [SAW-179/2024]

similarly situated as the respondents in the case of Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur & Anr. Vs. Bhanwar Singh and Jai Narain Vyas University, Jodhpur & Anr. Vs. Mukesh Sharma.

Therefore, it is submitted that even though the writ petitions were disposed of on the basis of order passed in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra), stay granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court would not affect the merits of the present case.

At this stage, what we find is that the sole basis for the learned Single Judge to allow the writ petition in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra), which order has been stayed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 22.01.2024. Therefore, in these circumstances, the impugned orders cannot be allowed to be executed and is therefore, kept in abeyance awaiting further order as may be passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra).

List all these appeals for further orders after six weeks."

2. Mr. Mohit Singh Choudhary, learned counsel appearing for

the respondent submits that the controversy involved in the

present appeal is already settled in the case of Jai Narain Vyas

University, Jodhpur & Anr. Vs. Mukesh Sharma (D.B.

Special Appeal Writ No.347/2019), decided on 13.08.2021.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants, however submits that

while considering the case of Mukesh Sharma (supra), the case of

Lalit Gehlot (supra) is being adjudicated by Hon'ble Supreme

Court and is currently pending.

4. This Court is of the considered opinion that these issues have

already attained finality from this Court in large number of cases

and now the Hon'ble Apex Court is seized of the controversy

therefore, no further application of mind is called for, as the

mandate of the Hon'ble Apex Court shall govern the present

respondents as well, be it in the case of Lalit Gehlot (supra).

5. Thus, the special appeal (writ) is disposed of with a direction

that the position of law in these cases shall be governed by the

judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalit Gehlot

(Uploaded on 20/01/2026 at 03:54:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:3055-DB] (3 of 3) [SAW-179/2024]

(supra). All benefits arising out of the order of the Hon'ble Apex

Court in Lalit Gehlot shall apply to the present respondent as well.

It is made clear that the appellants shall maintain all kinds of

parity for respondent regarding continuance in service with Lalit

Gehlot until the Lalit Gehlot (supra) is finally decided by the

Hon'ble Apex Court.

(SANDEEP SHAH),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J 23-mohit/-

(Uploaded on 20/01/2026 at 03:54:56 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter