Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dinesh vs Jaikishan (2026:Rj-Jd:1515)
2026 Latest Caselaw 371 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 371 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2026

[Cites 0, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Dinesh vs Jaikishan (2026:Rj-Jd:1515) on 12 January, 2026

[2026:RJ-JD:1515]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                    S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2532/2018

Dinesh S/o Banshi Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Badla,
District Udaipur.
                                                                         ----Appellant
                                       Versus
1.       Jaikishan S/o Haridev Tejawat Meena, R/o Nal Fala
         Balicha, Police Station Pahada, District Udaipur. (Driver)
2.       Hanja Ram S/o Havji Damor, R/o Badla, Kherwada,
         District Udaipur. (Owner)
3.       Icici      Lombard     General         Company             Limited,   Through
         Manager, Branch Office Panchwati, Near Royal Motors,
         Udaipur. (Insurer)
                                                                      ----Respondents
                                 Connected With
                    S.B. Civil Misc. Appeal No. 2543/2018
1.       Dinesh S/o Bansi Lal Meena, Aged About 33 Years, Badla,
         District Udaipur.
2.       Mahaveer S/o Dinesh Meena, Aged About 12 Years,
         Badla, District Udaipur.
3.       Sushri Raya D/o Dinesh Meena, Aged About 10 Years,
         Badla, District Udaipur.
4.       Kuldeep D/o Dinesh Meena, Aged About 6 Years, Badla,
         District Udaipur. (Appellant No. 2 To 4 Are Minor, Through
         Natural Guardian Father, Appellant No. 1 Dinesh Meena)
                                                                        ----Appellants
                                       Versus
1.       Jaikishan S/o Hardev Tejawat Meena, Nal Fala Balicha,
         Police Station Pahada, District Udaipur. (Driver)
2.       Hanja Ram S/o Havji Damor, Badla, Kherwada, District
         Udaipur. . (Owner)
3.       Icici   Lombard       General        Insurance         Company        Limited,
         Through Manager, Branch Office Panchwati, Near Royal
         Motors, Udaipur. (Insurer)
                                                                      ----Respondents




                         (Uploaded on 13/01/2026 at 02:47:56 PM)
                        (Downloaded on 13/01/2026 at 08:49:01 PM)
 [2026:RJ-JD:1515]                    (2 of 3)                    [CMA-2532/2018]


For Appellant(s)           :    Mr. G.S. Rathore
For Respondent(s)          :    Mr. Vinay Kothari



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT

Judgment

12/01/2026

1. The present appeals have been preferred against the

judgment and award dated 25.05.2018 passed by Motor Accident

Claims Tribunal No.2, Udaipur in Claim Case No. 328/2018 &

329/2018 whereby an amount of Rs.4,70,000/- & Rs.8,86,000/-

with interest @ 6 % per annum was awarded in favour of the

claimants. Vide the said award, the Insurance Company was

exonerated from the liability.

2. Today a memorandum of understanding has been placed on

record jointly by counsel for the claimants as well as respondent-

Insurance Company with a submission that a settlement has been

entered into between the parties. As per the settlement the

respondent- Insurance Company has admitted its liability and has

agreed to indemnify the owner and pay the compensation amount

to the claimants.

3. The Memorandum of understanding as filed is taken on

record.

4. Counsel for the claimants submits that till date they have not

received any amount from the owner and counsel for the owner

also admitted that he has not paid any amount qua the award to

the claimants till date.

5. The claimants have also undertaken that the amount, if any,

received by them from the owner/driver in furtherance of the

(Uploaded on 13/01/2026 at 02:47:56 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:1515] (3 of 3) [CMA-2532/2018]

Award, shall be returned/refunded back by them to the

owner/driver.

6. As per the Memorandum of Understanding, the respondent

Insurance Company has agreed to pay an amount of

Rs.5,00,000/- & Rs. 9,00,000/- to the claimants as a full and final

settlement of the case. The claimants have agreed to accept the

said amount.

7. In view of the above and in terms of the settlement as

entered into between the parties and in spirit of Lok Adalat, it is

held that now the claimants shall be entitled to a lumpsum

amount of Rs.5,00,000/- & Rs. 9,00,000/- as a full and final

settlement of the case. The amount so agreed shall be deposited

by the Insurance Company with the Tribunal within a period of

three months from today failing which, the same shall carry

interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of this order till actual

realization. The amount of compensation be disbursed/deposited

in terms of the award in the Saving Bank Account of the claimants

without insisting upon to deposit the same in Fixed Deposit.

8. The appeals stand disposed of with the above observations.

9. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

10. Let the record be sent back to the learned Tribunal forthwith.

(SANJEET PUROHIT),J 203-204/ Yagya/-

(Uploaded on 13/01/2026 at 02:47:56 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter