Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 360 Raj
Judgement Date : 12 January, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:1566]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13368/2023
Sanjeev Kumar Wadhwa S/o Tarachand, Aged About 36 Years, 6,
M.d.a. Ward No. 09, Munda Dist. Hanumangarh - Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Transport Commissioner
Cum Secretary, Transport Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur,
Sahkar Bhawan Marg, Parivahan Bhawan, Jaipur (Raj.).
2. Member Regional Transport Authority, Bikaner Region
Bikaner (Raj.), Shakar Bhawan Marg, Parivahan Bhawan,
Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Secretary, Regional Transport Authority Regional
Transport Officer, Bikaner Region, Bikaner (Raj.).
4. District Transport Officer, Hanumangarh.
5. State Of Haryana, Through Principal Secretary, Transport
Department, Haryana.
6. Regional Transport Authority, Sirsa, Haryana.
7. General Manager, Sirsa Haryana Roadway, Haryana.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Saurabh Maheshwari
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sandeep Soni for
Mr. B.L. Bhati, AAG
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL BENIWAL
Order
12/01/2026
1. The matter comes upon an application (I.A. No.01/2025) for
early hearing of the case.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is
allowed.
3. With consent of parties, the matter is heard finally.
(Uploaded on 12/01/2026 at 07:55:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:1566] (2 of 3) [CW-13368/2023]
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
controversy raised in the present writ petition is no more res
integra in view of the judgment passed by a co-ordinate Bench of
this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9208/2012 (Firoz
Khan Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) decided on 04.03.2013
so also S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12904/2016(Kendriya City
Bus Owners Association Jodhpur Vs. State of Rajasthan and
Ors.) decided on 07.07.2017.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present
writ petition may also be disposed of in the same terms as Firoz
Khan and Kendriya City Bus Owners Association Jodhpur
(supra). The relevant paras of the order (S.B. Civil Writ Petition
No.9208/2012) is reproduced herein below:
"After hearing learned counsel for the parties, I am of the opinion that Transport Department is under obligation to follow the rules and regulations and take appropriate action against the persons, if any violation is made by the permit holder. Therefore, this writ petition is disposed of with the direction to the Transport Department to take appropriate action against all those permit holders against whom complaints are received that they are contravening the terms and conditions of the permit and it is expected from the authorities of Transport Department of Government that action will be taken promptly as and when complaints are received with regard to violation of Rules and the terms and conditions of the permit."
6. Learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposed
the submission made on behalf of the petitioner, however, is not in
a position to refute the fact that the issue raised in the present
writ petition is identical to the one adjudicated in the case of Firoz
(Uploaded on 12/01/2026 at 07:55:58 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:1566] (3 of 3) [CW-13368/2023]
Khan and Kendriya City Bus Owners Association Jodhpur
(supra).
7. In view of the submissions made, the present writ petition is
disposed of in the same terms as was decided in the case of
Firoz Khan and Kendriya City Bus Owners Association
Jodhpur (supra).
8. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
(SUNIL BENIWAL),J
130-Ashutosh/-
(Uploaded on 12/01/2026 at 07:55:58 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!