Monday, 18, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Suresh Malpani vs Chandra Kanta (2026:Rj-Jd:4768)
2026 Latest Caselaw 1161 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1161 Raj
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Suresh Malpani vs Chandra Kanta (2026:Rj-Jd:4768) on 27 January, 2026

[2026:RJ-JD:4768]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                S.B. Civil Second Appeal No. 311/2025

1.       Suresh Malpani S/o Ramswaroop, Aged About 50 Years,
         Ladwa, Tehsil Riyanbadi, District Nagaur Raj..
2.       Ramesh S/o Banshilal, Aged About 55 Years, Merta City,
         Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur Raj..
                                                                  ----Appellants
                                    Versus
Chandra Kanta W/o Thakur Prasad, Sunaro Ka Mohalla, Meera
Marg, Merta City, Tehsil Merta, District Nagaur Raj..
                                                                 ----Respondent


For Appellant(s)          :     Mr. SL Jain.
                                Mr. Abhinav Jain.
For Respondent(s)         :     Mr. VD Gaur.



          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT

Order

27/01/2026

1. The present second appeal under Section 100 CPC has been

preferred by the appellants against the judgment and decree

dated 04.09.2025, passed by the learned District Judge, Merta,

District Nagaur (hereinafter referred to as "the learned Appellate

Court") in Civil Regular Appeal No.10/2024, whereby the appeal

filed by the appellants has been dismissed while affirming the

judgment and decree dated 03.08.2024 passed by the learned

Senior Civil Judge, Merta, District Nagaur (hereinafter referred to

as "the Trial Court") in Civil Original Suit No.48/2015, vide which

the suit filed by respondent-plaintiff for eviction, recovery of rent

arrears and mesne profit was decreed.

(Uploaded on 27/01/2026 at 07:15:21 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:4768] (2 of 3) [CSA-311/2025]

2. Learned counsel for the appellants on instructions submits

that he does not want to press this second appeal on merits,

however, prays that a reasonable time of at least two years to

vacate the subject premises and handover peaceful possession of

the same to the respondent-plaintiff may be granted.

3. Learned counsel for the respondent-plaintiff has no objection

if the premises in question is vacated and peaceful possession is

handed over to her on or before 31.07.2027.

4. In these circumstances, present second appeal is dismissed

as not pressed. However, appellants shall be allowed to retain the

possession of the suit premises and shall handover peaceful and

vacant possession of the shop (premises) in question to the

respondent on or before 31.07.2027, subject to following

conditions:-

(i) The appellants shall personally submit an undertaking supported by their affidavit before the trial Court to the effect that on or before 31.07.2027, they shall handover peaceful and vacant possession of the suit premises to the respondent-plaintiff. They shall also undertake neither to cause any damage to the suit premises, nor to make any alteration and not to assign, subject or in any manner part with possession to any other person and not to put the premises to any use other than the present use and not to cause any nuisance.

(ii) The appellants shall pay mesne profit as ordered by learned trial Court below and will further continue to pay the same on or before 7th day of each month in the bank account of the respondent-plaintiff or in the trial Court till the vacant possession of the suit property is handed over i.e. by 31.07.2027. The arrears of rent and mesne profit, as determined by learned trial Court, if not already paid, shall also be paid by them within a period of three months from today and entire amount, including amount already deposited on this account, will be disbursed to the respondent-plaintiff.

(Uploaded on 27/01/2026 at 07:15:21 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:4768] (3 of 3) [CSA-311/2025]

(iii) On appellants-defendants furnishing undertaking aforesaid and abiding by the terms and conditions of the order, respondent-plaintiff shall not execute impugned judgment and decree till 31.07.2027.

5. It is made clear that upon appellants failure to comply with

any of the conditions aforesaid or violating any terms of the

undertaking, the respondent-plaintiff shall be entitled to execute

judgment and decree impugned forthwith, besides initiating

proceedings for contempt of Court, in accordance with law.

6. No order as to costs.

7. The stay application also stands disposed of accordingly.

(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J 54-/Jitender//-

(Uploaded on 27/01/2026 at 07:15:21 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter