Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 1066 Raj
Judgement Date : 22 January, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:4081]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Writ Misc Application No. 34/2026
Rajesh Kumar S/o Shri Bal Ram, Aged About 50 Years, Ward
No.2, 2-H Bada Maderan, Sriganganagar, Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Department
Of Education Government Of Raj. Jaipur
2. The Director, Panchayati Raj And Elementary Education
Govt. Of Raj. Bikaner
3. The District Education Officer (Elementary Education),
Hanumangarh
4. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Hanumangarh
5. The Vikas Adhikari, Panchayat Samiti Tibbi District
Hanumangarh
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh for
Mr. D.S. Sodha
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order
22/01/2026
1. An application for recalling of order dated 13.01.2025 has
been filed with an averment that vide order dated 13.01.2025, a
liberty was granted to the petitioner to move a representation
before the competent authority, within a period of three months of
the order passed by Hon'ble the Supreme Court. The said
representation has been filed by the petitioner but the same
remains undecided till date.
(Uploaded on 23/01/2026 at 06:22:02 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:4081] (2 of 2) [WMAP-34/2026]
2. In view of the averment made, this Court is of the clear
opinion that the said cannot be a valid reason to recall order dated
13.01.2025.
3. Vide order dated 13.01.2025, while disposing of the writ
petition in light of the Division Bench judgment in Usha Kumari &
Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.; D.B. Spl. Appl. Writ
No.149/2022 (decided on 14.12.2022), the Court had observed
that if ultimately the judgment in Usha Kumari (supra) is
reversed/modified by Hon'ble the Apex Court, the petitioner shall
be at liberty to move an appropriate representation before the
competent Authority which shall be under an obligation to decide
the same in light of law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court.
4. The non decision on the representation of the petitioner
cannot be a ground for recalling of order dated 13.01.2025. The
remedy of the petitioner definitely lies somewhere else.
5. The application is hence rejected with a liberty to the
petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy, if so desired.
(REKHA BORANA),J 33-manila/-
(Uploaded on 23/01/2026 at 06:22:02 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!