[Cites 1, Cited by 0]
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur
Urn: Cw / 13776U / 2022World Renewal ... vs The Discoms, Jaipur ... on 29 April, 2026
Author: Sudesh Bansal
Bench: Sudesh Bansal
[2026:RJ-JD:20420]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12560/2022
Shugan Chandra Kothari Trust, Registered Office At M 227,
Greater Kailash, Part II, New Delhi - 110048 And Office At Delhi
Public School, Pal Bypass, Jodhpur Through Its Duly Authorized
Trustee Shri U R Daga Son Of Late Shri Mukun Raj Daga Aged
About 78 Years Resident Of 1/a/24, Nandanvan, Ward No. 5,
Chopasani Housing Board, Jodhpur.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan through The Joint Secretary,
Energy Department, Rvpn It Center, Chambal Power
House Campus, Hawa Sarak, Jaipur.
2. The Secretary, Finance Department, 1st Floor, Main
Building, Gate 2, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. The Chairman, Discom And Rajasthan Urja Vikas Nigam
Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur.
4. The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Through Its
Managing Director, New Power House, Industrial Area,
Jodhpur.
5. The Assistant Engineer (B-5), Jdvvnl, Jodhpur
6. The Chief Accounts Officer (B And R), Jdvvnl, Jodhpur.
----Respondents
Connected With
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1009/2022
1. Bhagwati Prasad Mathur S/o Shri Durga Lal, Aged About
63 Years, R/o 153, Shri Krishna Na Pal Road, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
2. Ashok Mathur S/o Shri Murli Lal Mathur, Aged About 64
Years, R/o 23-C/46, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
3. R.n. Purohit S/o Shri Rama Nathji Purohit, Aged About 68
Years, R/o 11/823, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
4. Anil Kumar Pungaliya S/o Late Shri Suraj Karan
Pungaliya, Aged About 68 Years, R/o 17E/97, Chopasni
Housing Board, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
(Downloaded on 04/05/2026 at 09:28:16 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (2 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
5. Bhanu Prakash Mirda S/o Shri Nathu Ram Mirda, Aged
About 68 Years, R/o Mirda Farm, Chopasni Road, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
6. Hukam Singh Panwar S/o Shri Heeralal Panwar, Aged
About 63 Years, R/o 4/b/22, 3Rd Pulia, Chopasni Housing
Board, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
7. Praveen Mathur S/o Shri Prakash Swaroop Mathur, Aged
About 62 Years, R/o Khasra No. 99, Near Bhati Diary,
Main Road, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
8. Suman Mathur W/o Shri Ganesh Lal Mathur, Aged About
67 Years, R/o 21/52, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
9. Dr. Sanjay K Mathur S/o Shri K.l. Mathur, Aged About 50
Years, R/o Plot No. A-125, Vinayak Vihar, Jodhpur,
Rajasthan.
10. Shiv Datt Bissa S/o Shri Uday Raj Bissa, Aged About 80
Years, R/o G-48, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
11. Ashok Mathur S/o Shri Dau Lal Ji Mathur, Aged About 65
Years, R/o 17-E/785, Near Icici Bank, Chopasni Housing
Board, Jodhpur.
12. Ashok Kumar Bohra S/o Shri Devkrisn Bohra, Aged About
71 Years, R/o 11/933, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur.
13. Dr. Sanjay Sharma S/o Shri Ramesh Chandra, Aged About
61 Years, R/o 17E/77, Chopasni Housing Board, Jodhpur.
14. Dayal Chandra Mathur S/o Shri Laxman Chandra Mathur,
Aged About 73 Years, R/o 17E/537, Chopasni Housing
Board, Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The Discoms Through Its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan
Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005
2. The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Through Its
Managing Director, New Power House, Industrial Area,
Jodhpur.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6739/2022
World Renewal Spiritual Trust, (Bk Chandrahas), Near Collector
Office, Through Its Authorized Signatory Sh. Sudhir Kumar S/o
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
(Downloaded on 04/05/2026 at 09:28:16 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (3 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
Shri Mahavir Prasad, Aged About 59 Years.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Discoms, Through Its Chairman, Vidyut Bhawan,
Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur-302005.
2. The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Through Its
Managing Director, New Power House, Industrial Area,
Jodhpur.
3. Assistant Engineer (O And M), Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran
Nigam Limited, Sirohi, Rajasthan.
----Respondents
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13825/2022
1. Dr. Vimal Soni S/o Sh. Surajmal Soni, Aged About 59
Years, R/o - Plot No. 16, Indira Vihar, Sector - 7, New
Ower House Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
2. Laxman Singh S/o Janak Singh, Aged About 56 Years, R/o
- 456, Umed Heritage, Defence Lab Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
3. Jugal Kishor S/o Ghanshyam, Aged About 70 Years, R/o -
Plot No. - 40 Indira Vihar, Sector - 7, New Power House
Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
4. Rameshwar Lal S/o Puran Ram, Aged About 52 Years,
R/o- Plot No. 52 Indira Vihar, Section - 7, New Power
House Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
5. Virendra Kumar Soni S/o Chauthmal, Aged About 67
Years, R/o - 284, Chand Kutir, Maliyo Ki Gali, Opp, Shiv
Mandir, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.).
6. Anita Jha W/o Praveen Kumar Jha, Aged About 54 Years,
R/o - B-61, Khasra No. - 16, (M.corp), Nano-Max,
Shikargarh, Jodhpur (Raj.).
7. Rajendra Pungalia S/o Omprakash, Aged About 47 Years,
R/o - Ds Tower, Opp. Ship House, Bheel Basti, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
8. Jagpal Singh S/o Pritam Singh, Aged About 89 Years, R/o
- 208, C Road, 3rd Gali, Opp. Krishna Mandir, Ratanada,
Jodhpur (Raj.).
9. Hukmichand Jain S/o Mohanlal Jain, Aged About 41 Years,
R/o - Plot No. 93, Padmavati Nagar, Paota B Road,
Jodhpur (Raj.).
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
(Downloaded on 04/05/2026 at 09:28:16 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (4 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
10. M/s Ashapurna Buildcon Ltd, C/o Karan Singh Age - 54,
R/o - Khasra No. 54/2 Basni Benda, (M.corp) Jhalamand,
Jodhpur (Raj.).
11. Karan Singh Khichi S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 54
Years, R/o 4/a, East Patel Nagar, Circuit House, Road,
Ratnada, Jodhpur (Raj.).
12. Supriya Kanwar W/o Karan Singh, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o - Plot No. - 123, Central School Scheme, Airforce,
Jodhpur (Raj.).
13. Girnar Hotels C/o Karan Singh, Age - 54, R/o - Plot No. 4/
f, Shastri Nagar, Jodhpur (Raj.).
14. Karan Singh S/o Mohan Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o
Ashapurna Tower, Ashapurna Basera, Jaisalmer Road,
Barmer (Raj.)
15. M/s Ashapurna Buildcon Ltd., C/o Harshvardhan Singh
Karan Singh, Age 34, R/o- Khasra No. 492/498/1,
Ashapurna Basera, (M.corp) Pal Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
16. Chottu Singh Khichi S/o Sharvan Singh Chichi, Aged
About 42 Years, R/o Plot No. - 75, Central School
Scheme, Airforce, Jodhpur (Raj.).
17. Dr. Savita Singhal W/o Ram Prakash Singhal, Aged About
62 Years, R/o - Plot No. 111, Vinayak Vihar, Near Dali Bai
Circle, Jodhpur (Raj.).
18. Harendra Pratap S/o Daulatram, Aged About 61 Years, R/
o Bhati Chauraha, Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.).
19. Meena Soni W/o Nirmal Soni, Aged About 54 Years, R/o -
Plot No. - 47, Vaibhav Vihar, Shikargarh Road, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
20. Jugal Kishore Soni S/o Nirmal Soni, Aged About 54 Years,
R/o - 284, Chand Kutir, Maliyo Ki Gali, Opp, Shiv Mandir,
Ratanada, Jodhpur (Raj.).
21. Rita Rathore W/o Tej Pratap Singh Rathore, Aged About
58 Years, R/o - Plot No. - 196, Umed Heritage, Defence
Lab Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
22. O.p. Vishnoi S/o Bhanwarlal, Aged About 52 Years, R/o
Gali No. 6, Shaksti Nagar, Paota-C Rod, Jodhpur (Raj.).
23. Rajwant Kaur W/o Gurupal Singh, Aged About 46 Years,
R/o - Plot No. 47, Sectino-7, New Power House Road,
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
(Downloaded on 04/05/2026 at 09:28:16 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (5 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
Jodhpur (Raj.).
24. Renu Dave W/o Rajendra Dave, Aged About 60 Years, R/o
Plot No. 4, Jalam Vilas, Paota, Jodhpur (Raj.).
25. Mohan Kishan Panwar S/o B.l. Panwar, Aged About 58
Years, R/o - Near K. N. Girls College, Rai-Ka-Bagh,
Jodhpur (Raj.).
26. M/s Raj Rock Exports P. Ltd, C/o Pankaj Solanki, Age 45,
Plot No. - G/49, Stone Park Industrial Area, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
27. Om Prakash Mehta S/o Arjun Singhji Mehta, Aged About
58 Years, R/o Plot No. 248, Umed Heritage, Defence Lab
Road, Jodhpur (Raj.).
28. Manish Vadhwani S/o Nanakramji Vadhwani, Aged About
43 Years, R/o Plot No. 290, Jwala Vihar, Suthala, Jodhpur
(Raj.).
29. Dilip Vadhwani S/o Nanakramji Vadhwani, Aged About 40
Years, R/o 1/a/17, C.h.b. Jodhpur (Raj.).
----Petitioners
Versus
1. The Chairman, Discom And Rajasthan Urja Vikas Nigam
Limited, Vidyut Bhawan Janpath Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur -
302005.
2. The Jodhpur Vidyut Vitaran Nigam Limited, Through Its
Managing Director, New Power House, Industrial Area,
Jodhpur (Raj.) 342005.
3. Finance Department, Government Of Rajasthan Through
Its Secretary, Main Building, Gate No. 2, Government
Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yashraj Singh Kanawat
Mr. Ankur Mathur
Ms. Varsha Paliwal
Mr. Sunil Kumar Verma
Mr. Vasu Dev Gaur
For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dheerendra Singh Sodha with
Mr. Rajat Choudhary
Mr. Anirudh Singh Shekhawat
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
(Downloaded on 04/05/2026 at 09:28:16 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (6 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order
29/04/2026
1. In this batch of writ petitions, the grievance of all petitioners
is identical in nature in respect of claiming exemption from the
electricity duty as promised by the State under the Solar Policy
2019. The writ petition came to be filed when the State revoked
the exemption.
2. Counsel appearing on behalf of respondent- Jodhpur Vidyut
Vitran Nigam Limited pointed out that the issues raised and
involved in these writ petitions have been dealt with by the
Division Bench in D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1151/2023 titled
as M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. Vs. Energy Department and
other connected matters decided vide judgment dated
06.04.2026, hence, these writ petitions may be disposed of in
terms of judgment dated 06.04.2026. A copy of the judgment of
Division Bench has been produced before this Court. The relevant
portion of the judgment, Para No.20 & 21, reads as under:-
"20. As an upshot, we are satisfied that, no doubt,
while the State can alter/amend/withdraw its policy in
the larger public interest and/or fiscal requirements,
but cannot take away accrued rights. Thus, the
petitioners herein are entitled to the limited benefit
ofthe exemption promised under the Solar Policy,
2019, only in respect of those projects which have
already been commissioned prior to the impugned
amendment. The said amendment cannot operate
retrospectively to divest accrued rights and can only
have prospective effect.
21. With these observations, the writ petition is
accordingly disposed of with liberty to verify exact
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
[2026:RJ-JD:20420] (7 of 7) [CW-12560/2022]
commercial operations date of each of the two solar
projects set up by the petitioner i.e. as to whether the
same are prior to amendment in the policy and,
thereafter, pass independent orders qua each claim of
seeking exemption from the electricity duty by
granting benefit for the limited period of seven years
w.e.f. the commercial operations date (COD)."
3. Counsel for petitioners do not oppose the prayer of
respondent and agreeable to dispose of these writ petitions in
terms of directions issued by the Hon'ble Division Bench in case of
M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra).
4. Accordingly, these writ petitions stand disposed of in the
same terms as indicated in the judgment passed by the Hon'ble
Division Bench in case of M/s Ultra Tech Cement Ltd. (supra).
5. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J
NITIN/Rashu/14-17
(Uploaded on 30/04/2026 at 09:13:21 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
