Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:17265)
2026 Latest Caselaw 5852 Raj

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5852 Raj
Judgement Date : 15 April, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur

Vinod Kumar vs State Of Rajasthan (2026:Rj-Jd:17265) on 15 April, 2026

Author: Kuldeep Mathur
Bench: Kuldeep Mathur
[2026:RJ-JD:17265]

      HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
                       JODHPUR
                  S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5900/2026

Vinod Kumar S/o Manoharlal, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Indra
Colony, Jawal, Sirohi, District Sirohi.
                                                                           ----Petitioner
                                          Versus
1.       State       Of   Rajasthan,          Through         Secretary        Of    Home
         Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur.
2.       Cyber       Police    Station,       Through         S.h.o.      West      Region,
         Mumbai, Ist Floor, Police Station Building G Block Bandra
         Kurla Complex (Bkc) Bandra (East) Mumbai Maharashtra-
         400051
3.       Cyber Police Station Nagpur City, Through S.h.o. 23A
         Narendra         Nagar,         Somalwada,         Nagpur,        Maharashtra-
         440015.
4.       Cyber Police Station, Tambaram, Through S.h.o. Shanthi
         Nagar 2Nd Main Road, Tambara Chennai, Tamil Nadu-
         600045.
5.       Cyber Police Station, Through S.h.o. North Cen Crime,
         Bangalore, Yeshwanthpur, Bangalore City, Karnataka-
         560022.
6.       State Bank Of India, Through Branch Manager Branch
         Jawal,      Main     Road,       Jawal,      District        Sirohi   Rajasthan-
         307801.
                                                                        ----Respondents


For Petitioner(s)              :     Mr. Govind Singh Meena for
                                     Mr. Manohar Singh
For Respondent(s)              :     -



            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR

Order

15/04/2026

(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 02:20:58 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:17265] (2 of 3) [CW-5900/2026]

1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following

reliefs:-

"It is therefore humbly prayed that the present Civil Writ Petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate, order or direction :-

(1). By the issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction the impugned action of the respondent bank and the respondent investigation agency unconstitutional, Consequently, the same may be quashed, set aside and rendered null and void in the interest of justice.

(2). By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to de-freeze the saving account in State Bank of India, Branch Jawal, District Sirohi A/c no. 40472314104, IFSC Code SBIR0031527 and Release the hold amount of the petitioner with immediate effect.

(3). By an appropriate writ order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to not freeze the bank account of the Petitioner in future without prior notice.

(4). Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner."

2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,

this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition

with a direction to the State Bank of India (Respondent No.6) to

keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred

illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the

petitioner to make transactions from his bank account from the

remaining balance.

3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent - Bank

has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the

disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to

be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication

to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the

amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the

instant order.

(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 02:20:58 PM)

[2026:RJ-JD:17265] (3 of 3) [CW-5900/2026]

4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned

Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise

the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within

a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the

respondent - Bank. The respondent - bank shall thereafter do the

needful as directed herein above.

5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank

does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating

Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance

with the instant order.

6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand

disposed of.

(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 5-divya/-

(Uploaded on 15/04/2026 at 02:20:58 PM)

Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter