Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 5426 Raj
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2026
[2026:RJ-JD:16255]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7715/2026
Karni General Store, Proprietor Nirmal Kumar Nayak S/o Raju
Ram Nayak, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Aadarsh Vidhya Mandir Ke
Piche, Gangashahar, Dist. Bikaner Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Union Of India, Through The Secretary, Finance
Department, Secretariat, New Delhi.
2. The Branch Manager, Indian Overseas Bank, Pokar
Quarters, Rani Bazar, Chopra Katla, Dist. Bikaner,
Rajasthan.
3. The Zonal Manager/general Manager, Indian Overseas
Bank Dist. Bikaner, Rajasthan
4. National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal Represented By Its
Director, National Highway-8, New Delhi.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramniwas Haniya
For Respondent(s) : --
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR
Order
08/04/2026
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following
reliefs:-
" It is, therefore, humbly prayed that the present Writ Petition may kindly be allowed and by an appropriate, order or direction-
(i) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to de-freeze the bank account bearing Account Number 160802000000740.
IFSC Code- IOBA00001608 of the Petitioner in RespondentIndian Overseas Bank Branch Rani Bazar Chopra Katla.
(ii) By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent may kindly be directed to not freeze the
(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:47:46 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:16255] (2 of 3) [CW-7715/2026]
bank account of the petitioner in future without prior notice.
(iii) Any other order or direction which this Hon'ble Court deems just and proper may kindly be passed in favor of the petitioner."
2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case,
this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition
with a direction to the Indian Overseas Bank (Respondent Nos.2 &
3) to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was
transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen
and allow the petitioner to make transactions from his bank
account from the remaining balance.
3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent - Bank
has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the
disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to
be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication
to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the
amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the
instant order.
4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned
Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise
the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within
a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the
respondent - Bank. The respondent - bank shall thereafter do the
needful as directed herein above.
5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank
does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating
Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance
with the instant order.
(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:47:46 PM)
[2026:RJ-JD:16255] (3 of 3) [CW-7715/2026]
6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand
disposed of.
(KULDEEP MATHUR),J 71-himanshu/-
(Uploaded on 08/04/2026 at 04:47:46 PM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!