Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 13319 Raj
Judgement Date : 16 September, 2025
[2025:RJ-JD:41274-DB]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT
JODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14287/2023
Miraj Retails Pvt. Ltd., Having Registered Address At Sant Krapa,
Upali Odan, Nathdwara, Rajsamand, Rajasthan - 313301
Through Authorized Representative Mr. Manohar Paliwal, S/o
Indra Paliwal, Chandpole Girwa, Udaipur, Rajasthan - 313001
Email Id- [email protected] Mobile No.- 91-
8875016288
----Petitioner
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Ito Wd-1, Commerce House, Collectorate
Road, Rajsamand, Rajasthan - 313326 Email Id-
[email protected]
----Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr. Pranav Bhardwaj for Mr. Sanjay
Nahar, Advocate.
For Respondent(s) : Mr. K.K. Bissa, Advocate.
HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. K.R. SHRIRAM
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order
16/09/2025
1. Mr. K.K. Bissa agrees with Mr. Pranay Bhardwaj that one of
the grounds raised is certainly covered by a judgment of this
Court.
2. Ground referred to is that the notice dated 31.03.2023 under
Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been issued by a
Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) and not Faceless Assessing
Officer (FAO) and this Court in the case of Shree Cement
Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax &
Others1 following Sharda Devi Chhajer Vs. The Income Tax
1 DB Civil Writ Petition No.10540/2024, dated 05.08.2025 at Jaipur Bench (unreported)
(Uploaded on 19/09/2025 at 11:50:05 AM)
[2025:RJ-JD:41274-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-14287/2023]
Officer & Another2 and Hexaware Technologies Ltd. Vs.
Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 15(1)(2) 3,
has held that such a notice will be bad and not valid.
3. At the same time, Mr. K.K. Bissa states that in Hexaware
Technologies Ltd. (supra), Revenue has preferred a Special Leave
Petition and notice has been issued. Counsel states that in view of
the law as it stands today, Court may grant the prayer of
petitioner but in case the Apex Court interferes with judgment in
Hexaware Technologies Ltd. (supra), Sharda Devi Chhajer (supra)
or Shree Cement Limited (supra), then Revenue should be given
liberty to revive the notice issued under Section 148 of the Act.
4. Mr. Pranay Bhardwaj states that in view of the above, for the
present, petitioner will reserve his right to raise other grounds at
an appropriate stage.
5. Therefore, keeping open all rights and contentions of parties,
we quash and set aside notice dated 31.03.2023 issued under
Section 148 of the Act with liberty as prayed.
6. Petition disposed.
7. Consequently, all pending applications, if any, also stand
disposed.
8. In case, if any re-assessment order is passed, the same will
also stand quashed and set aside.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J (K.R. SHRIRAM),CJ
22-a.asopa/-
2 2025 SCC OnLine 3386
3 [2024] 162 taxmann.com 225(Bombay)
(Uploaded on 19/09/2025 at 11:50:05 AM)
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!